 |
|
| FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more » |
Apparently, a lot of people who use the web are concerned about the whiteness of their teeth, if display ads are any measure. Are you?
Still amazed that ALL car commercials target people who like to drive too fast. These ad agencies get paid big $$$ to ignore most buyers.
Great full transcript of interview with Twitter COO @DickC at CrunchUp. http://www.techcrunch.com/2009...
RealTime CrunchUp: Conversation With Twitter COO Dick Costolo - http://www.techcrunch.com/2009...
RT @michelemclellan: New post @kdmc: - Publish2 and the power of the link. http://www.knightdigitalmediac...
@spf2 Here: http://www.publish2.com/newsgro... Anyone can put a widget of the collaboratively curated news on their site. A newswire for the web.
GAO says it saved taxpayers $43B in fiscal 2009 -- Federal Computer Week - http://fcw.com/article...
GAO saved taxpayers a significant amount. http://fcw.com/article...
@MrRickWaghorn Capitulation on advertising = some people giving up on advertising as a business model to support journalism
@jayrosen_nyu e.g. if someone can't imagine new high-value ad formats, should be forced to concede failure of imagination.
@jayrosen_nyu You might consider a special exception to conceptual purity because capitulation on advertising is such a pivotal issue.
@jayrosen_nyu Too much capitulation on #6. Might segment into low-value traditional and high-value new. Force explicit response to new.
.@jayrosen_nyu How about simply traditional advertising formats and new advertising formats?
@jayrosen_nyu Q about subsidy #6: Is this print ad formats sold with little value on Web (e.g. display ads), or new value-creating formats?
RT @digiphile: Naming the ’00s [NYT] http://www.nytimes.com/2009... “I would recommend the Noughty-aughts” - David Brin
.@ianbetteridge Exactly. If a journalist published a list of sources they planned to interview, but not the reported article, you'd say WTF?
.@ianbetteridge Lists are low value curating. You're still making users who follow your lists do most of the work, i.e. read EVERY tweet.
Audience for unfiltered Twitter is dropping http://www.techcrunch.com/2009... Huge opportunity for curating Twitter (hint: Lists are NOT curating)
Somebody will make a killing curating Twitter, especially as Twitter Lists become a low value commodity.
Trouble At Twitter: U.S. Visitors Down 8 Percent In October - http://www.techcrunch.com/2009...
Twitter Direct Messaging, thy name is spam. Anybody got a good filter?
@dannysullivan If Vs were really high tech, they'd obviously be using Twitter to broadcast. Imagine V Twitter account - 4 billion followers.
Google Apps spam filter is catching so much real email it's turning into a new inbox. Happens in the middle of existing threads. #trainwreck
No, @listorious is a directory. I mean a TWITTER list that is actually populated by other lists. So you only have to follow one list.
Who will be the first to start doing lists of Twitter lists? Like a fund of funds. Or a list of lists of lists. One list to rule them all.
.@dsearls: Apples is an example only of itself, it's completely unique, like a Picasso.
Other ways to read this feed:
