Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »

Sean McBride › Comments

Bindu Reddy
Wondering if we really need to see these tweets in real time on Google search results.... the quality of these tweets seems to be very low. Maybe Google should be filtering tweets.. Not sure how this is useful at all to someone searching Google for "Tiger Woods"
Screen shot 2009-12-08 at 7.29.49 PM.png
I was dreading this, knowing it was coming sooner or later, it degrades your search precision - sofarsoShawn
I think this will only increase twitter spam :(( Google is usually very very religious about their search result quality... not sure how this got through... - Bindu Reddy
Exactly, the more you tweet, the better your chances are for a site hit - sofarsoShawn
interesting. didn't even realize there's these kinds of google search results now. thanks for the heads up! - See-ming Lee 李思明 SML
Yup, I am writing a bot that scrapes Google trends, extracts search terms and writes tweets every 2 minutes with those search terms :) - Bindu Reddy
New SEO pioneering! I want in! & it's also not just Twitter, but also Jaiku, identi.ca Myspace, FriendFeed & Facebook. & Bing (except for FB & TW) won't be including them in their search results. - sofarsoShawn
I the quality of all tweets seems to be very low. - Gabe
Oh bleh. Just tried a search for "snow". The realtime results are very distracting. Let us opt out, or put it on the side somewhere. - Laura Norvig from iPod
It's good to bring more users to twitter though, as they keep getting twitter rubbed into their face. That being said I should try that search. - Richard A.
Interesting. So you can try spam these services, and get a high position on Google immediately. But filtering... based on what? The usual filters work on authority which in turn often works on ratings, citations, backlinks etc., and these won't be real-time because people first have to see and digest the message in question in order to link, cite and rate it. - Philipp Lenssen
It auto-updates and that is an interesting feature. That's something I could see some use for :-) - Richard A.
On the spam and SEO topic. Don't you think it'd measure retweet strength. If a lot of people retweet a subject then the link would be more relevant/interesting than if just one person retweets. Sorry for going slightly off topic. As an aside do retweets move back up to the top of the search? Should try cop15 and see how it behaves. - Richard A.
@Philipp: smart question (as usual). I guess that Google's rank/filter could be based not on the tweet, but on the tweeter: e.g. someone who has many followers is a good source, etc. E.g. Google too should (in this case) change its paradigm, switching from a "web of pages" to a "web of people". - milivella
Google needs real time spam/foul language filter. - ashish from iPhone
Have they implemented safesearch for real time search? - ashish from iPhone
@Philipp You have nailed the issue :) It is really really difficult to get a good grip on "quality" if the information/data is real-time. I still can't really figure out what the motivation behind doing something like this on the Google main search results is. - Bindu Reddy
Sometimes it is nice to see people giving their reactions to news or event in real time but I hope it improves overtime. - ashish from iPhone
Am I the only one here who is using Topsy http://www.topsy.com on a daily basis to cut through Twitter noise? Works like a charm. News recommender systems are the Next Big Thing. - Sean McBride
Sean, I'm on twitter for the conversations :-). I looked at topsy and I'll have to play with it, see how I could have fun with it. - Richard A.
Richard A. -- I use Friendfeed for conversations (much more capable for that activity than Twitter, in my opinion). And I use Topsy to identify and grab the most important news on specialized topics flowing through Twitter. To each his or her own. - Sean McBride
Of course.. - Symon Muchina Thuo
Johnny Worthington
The idea that humans 'don't contribute to global warming' is false:
earth.gif
Carbon in the atmosphere, even in very small numbers, effects the natural cooling system of the earth. The Greenhouse Effect if you will. While the Earth has it's own cycle of cooling and heating, the question is what effect are we having on accelerating this cycle and how long until conditions become such that we can not support the current population. Here are the 4 major things we as humans do to increase the carbon levels. - Johnny Worthington
1. We extract oil from the ground, convert it to a 5 chain carbon and burn it inefficiently. - Johnny Worthington
2. We burn coal inefficiently for power, that's carbon - Johnny Worthington
3. We burn wood (trees), that's carbon - Johnny Worthington
4. We cut down trees and use the land for other things besides growing a tree (trees suck up carbon when they grow) - Johnny Worthington
Now those 4 things really hit their stride when the Industrial Revolution kicked in. If data exists that shows a spike in carbon levels post-IR, then it's confirmed. The only question left then is to what level our actions are contributing and what we do to stop it. - Johnny Worthington
</rant> - Johnny Worthington
All of your points are correct, Johnny. So, humans are contributing to the natural occurrence of the current warming cycle. This is not refutable. By how much? 10%? That's the discussion. - MVB (Curmudgeon of FF)
Actually, the discussions I am hearing also include "The Earth is not warming", "Carbon has no effect on increasing the greenhouse effect" and "Humans do not effect climate change at all". Really, I want us to be all wrong and Global Warming to not be truthful, but unless the 'skeptics' can cast aside the radicals from their side as well, the discussion goes no where. - Johnny Worthington
Good summary of the key issues and points. - Sean McBride
Observation of the release of carbon into the system does not prove that the release of the carbon has any effect on the system. You have not even begun to account for the system's uses for and adaptation to various carbon levels over time. The bottom line is to create a new world government, like the Copenhagen treaty proposes, in the name of ecology has nothing to do with energy independence and everything to do with power and money. - pitlord
pitlord I love you man - Rasmus Lauridsen
*laughs softly at her husband* - Bette Cooper
Pitlord. Photons from the sun strikes the land. The land warms and emits an infrared photon. This IR photon strikes particles (like carbon dioxide molecules) and, as it is captured, sets up a flexing motion in the molecule. Soon afterwards, the molecule emits an infrared photon that travels to the ground. After emission, the molecule stops flexing and returns to its original state. Now... more... - Johnny Worthington
I'm no Greenie BTW... I just listened in science class. - Johnny Worthington
If you accept these facts, then it's clear that increasing carbon dioxide levels means increasing temperatures, which means rising sea levels, severe changes in weather patterns, and catastrophic changes to various ecosystems. Regardless of the exact magnitude of our role in this, don't you agree that these things are worth trying to prevent or at least mitigate? Pumping even more CO2 into the atmosphere doesn't seem to be a good way of doing that. - Victor Ganata
Victor, I agree. The Earth is going to eventually throw us off the edge of the cliff... I just don't want to step on the accelerator. I am also happy to be wrong... REALLY. I take no joy in possibly being right about climate change. - Johnny Worthington
The greenhouse effect is basic science even apart from the question of climate change. Planets with a heavy atmosphere trap most of the sun's heat; planets with little atmosphere reflect most of the heat back into space. If you change the composition of the atmosphere (either by adding greenhouse gases or blowing a hole in it with CFCs), the earth's climate with change accordingly. - John (a.k.a. dendroica)
The way some skeptics put it, you would think that even that basic science were in doubt. I mean, if the earth is going into a warming cycle, regardless of our own role in it, are we really just going to let coastal cities drown? Fertile fields turn into dust bowls? You would think it would be something we'd want to do something about, even if it were a totally "natural" occurrence. - Victor Ganata
Sequestering and scrubbing of SO2 which was done by the Clean Air Act and the EPA in 1990 has actually increased CO2 thereby contributing to global warming. The following is from a Jonah Goldberg thought experiment====> In the great scheme of trade-offs in the history of humanity, never has there been a better one than trading a tiny amount of global warming for a massive amount of... more... - Eric Logan
To be frank, Eric, the people who got that 1800% GDP growth aren't the ones who climate change will effect greatly. I bet if you ask some of the poor island nations who will be under water in a few decades, or the African nations who will be cast into drought and famine, they'd tell you that's a shitty bargain. - Johnny Worthington
The fact that economic growth would necessarily slow down by dropping emissions is a false assumption, though, particularly given the rate of technological change. If we had focused on energy sources that didn't have high CO2 emissions from the start, maybe we'd have a safe reliable grid running almost entirely on nuclear fission by now. We might also have totally different forms of transportation. The refusal to innovate is what dooms economies, really. - Victor Ganata
Johnny, how do future generations NOT benefit from a prosperous economy? There is no proof that any nations will be "underwater" anymore than there was proof in the 70's that the earth would turn into a giant ice cube. First you say you'd like to see more rational discussion then you make emotional appeals based on unproven claims. - pitlord
Pitlord, my statement was is reaction to a point about "But hey, the West got rich" - Johnny Worthington
Let's be honest, if Shell, BP or Exxon could find out a way to be making money off green energy, we wouldn't be having this discussion. - Johnny Worthington
It's more like "but hey, the west made enormous leaps and bounds of advancements that will allow future generations to live longer, happier, healthier lives. And still nobody has conclusively proven that anthropogenic climate change is a reality. - pitlord
"And still nobody has conclusively proven that anthropogenic climate change is a reality". We burn carbon, it changes the chemical makeup of the atmosphere. By a little or a lot, doesn't matter... it does. - Johnny Worthington
Johnny, correlation does not equal causation. - pitlord
Pitlord, You so have a spot on my Dance Card you so funni - Rasmus Lauridsen
Shell, BP and Connoco have found a way to get rich from green energy it is called Cap and Trade the exact solution presently being strong armed by the Congress by this new EPA ruling. There are lots of peer reviewed studies about the E.U. ETS which is a presently operating carbon exchange. Instead of encouraging innovation the U.S. has been pushing moonshine/ ethanol as a solution because it is politically expedient despite the fact that it take as much energy to produce as it stores. - Eric Logan
OK Pitlord, let me ask you. What evidence would you be willing to accept as proof that anthropogenic climate change is occurring. Seriously, what level of detail would you need? Would you accept modeling? How much data, what time span? What type of peer review do you require? Should Oprah be able to explain it? Seriously... I can throw hundreds of scientific papers at you but you can just simply wave them away. Tell me what you want to see to change your mind. - Johnny Worthington
Eric, I agree with that. Ethanol and other 'green' fuels often take natural resources and forest/farming land (don't get me started of volatilization). I think it is also important to understand there is not one magic bullet. It is a culture change. We have to do a number of things all at once, not just fill up the car with a new fuel. - Johnny Worthington
Also Pitlord, "correlation does not equal causation" is fine, but the Greenhouse Effect is actually something. It's how we live on Earth right now. It's a long and established thing discovered by Joseph Fourier in 1824, first reliably experimented on by John Tyndall in 1858, and first reported quantitatively by Svante Arrhenius in 1896. It's basic. By adding to the cocktail, we change the drink. Simple logic. - Johnny Worthington
Eric lost me at "Jonah Goldberg thought experiment." (Hah!) In any case, controlling some types of particulate emissions does not increase the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, it simply removes a substance that was masking their full effect. (And it wasn't even doing a very good job of that, since the climate was already warming before particulate matter was controlled.) There are good... more... - John (a.k.a. dendroica)
Ethanol in particular is an egregious example where massive government subsidies are spent on a technology that does not solve the problem and produces 54 % more CO2 than gasoline. - Eric Logan
I actually agree on ethanol; it's harmful to the environment in multiple ways. But that's our agricultural lobby at work. - John (a.k.a. dendroica)
Eric, while not totally scientific, a local TV station did a Mythbusters-eque experiment by running two identical cars, one on unleaded and one on 10% ethonal, in a controlled setting. Not only was the 10% less ecconomical (needed refueling more often) but it was so bad that the 'eccological savings' were worse that running the 100% unleaded car. Now, that's a FAIL, but it shouldn't be pointed to as a reason that this whole thing is BS. - Johnny Worthington
Agreed, It is an example where government solutions do not have desired effects and are subject to political pressure or whims. - Eric Logan
Of course government action is subject to political pressure. That's democracy at work. It's also why we still haven't had any significant response to climate change in the U.S. even though it has been a known problem for 20 years. - John (a.k.a. dendroica)
John, There are also more recent reports that sea water scrubbing of SO2 in shipping which is estimated to be 2% of global CO2 emissions. Does in fact release additional CO2 for every 1 KG SO2 scrubbed 2.75 KG of CO2 are produced.. Krystallon a subsidiary of B.P. produces the scrubbers they deny this. Erik Ranheim from Intertanko an independent group produced the report. There are new Cleantech ventures that claim to have new processes that solve this problem nothing implemented presently. - Eric Logan
The thing is, SO2 has far more obvious effects on the human body than CO2 does--if you lived in L.A. during the 1980s, you probably know exactly what SO2 can do to you. So if I had to choose between increased levels of SO2 and increased levels of CO2, it would be a pretty easy choice to make. That said, even if scrubbing SO2 results in an increase in CO2 levels, there's no reason why we can't try to mitigate it by decreasing CO2 emissions elsewhere. - Victor Ganata
This company claims to have a solution, the temporary increase in acidity of the seawater self regulating back to an alkaline state is the natural process that Intertanko claims emits additional CO2 http://cleantech.com/news... - Eric Logan
Johnny, to answer your question if I knew what experiment would provide the data to conclusively answer the question of what effect is mankind having on the climate I would either be up for a Nobel Prize or floating face down in the East River. The question is irrelevant because we both agree that it will benefit us all to pursue every avenue of clean alternative energy sources. Where... more... - pitlord
I also think that giving government yet another opportunity to abridge our human rights for their own ill gotten gain in the name of unresolved scientific problems is a huge mistake. - pitlord
Pitlord, I would love for that to happen... except existing private enterprises like Big Oil have some say politically in the research and develop of such technologies. A lot of private research and develop these days are funded by government tax breaks and grants. If Mr Oil doesn't want to loose money, he can lean on Mr Politician to cut funding. The difference is, it's a lot easier for a politician to say no if the public (and world) mood backs his position. - Johnny Worthington
pitlord
The scary thing is that there are actually people who are ignorant or stupid enough to buy into Al Gore's lies. - pitlord from Bookmarklet
Blatant disinformation and lies casual observers all over will repeat this lie as if it is the gospel. Small wonder the polarization continues unabated. The process is presently designed to marginalize dissent. - Eric Logan
All of this misses the point: a substantial majority of the world's leading climate scientists are still convinced, on the basis of the empirical data, that anthropogenic global warming is a serious problem facing the human race, and possibly a catastrophic problem. Global warming deniers are being crushed by the weight of the best science -- this is why they tend to flail around verbally and hurl a great deal of verbal abuse. They can't debate the science. - Sean McBride
Did you even read this post Sean ? Can you point to anything factual Al Gore has said here in reference to this topic ? - Eric Logan
The climate change alarmists are not willing to have their data studied or questioned. They are not willing to allow any debate and their only response to questions or challenges is to cast aspersions on the questioner and stifle debate. If anthropogenic climate change actually is a reality then their should be no resistance to testing the science that lead to that conclusion. This article is a prime example of this, via the head climate alarmist, Al Gore. - pitlord
Pitlord -- you are making hysterical charges that are out of touch with reality. Discussion and debate about climate change are for the most part conducted openly in peer-reviewed scientific journals. The process is transparent and democratic, but meritocratic -- your science needs to be first-rate to acquire traction and impact. In an earlier exchange you were unable to mention even a... more... - Sean McBride
Sean, again you choose to try and turn the discussion away from the topic at hand (i.e. Al Gore's lies and evasions) and toward a character assassination of the O.P. I'm sorry to see that you are unable to debate the topic based on the facts. Better luck next time. - pitlord
Pitlord -- you are a religious fundamentalist, and all religious fundamentalists strike me as irrational children who are allergic to and irritated by science (that is why so many of them are creationists). You can't debate the science of AGW, and people like you decisively lost this debate years ago. That is why you are also going to lose the policy debate on AGW -- the best science is not on your side. - Sean McBride
Eric -- Gore got it wrong about the dates of the emails, and that issue is entirely irrelevant to the consensus view among climate change experts on AGW. Major grasping at straws in this line of argument. - Sean McBride
Sean - the e-mail assuredly do not fit the characterization of the most recent being ten years old. The ones I have examined from Phil Jones in reference to there being a cooling trend that may continue until 2020 where he expresses the hope that his colleague is wrong so he can wipe the smug grins of his detractors faces are from Jan 2009. - Eric Logan
It gives the impression to those that are uniformed that these are very old e-mails when nothing could be further from the truth. I also do not believe it to be an innocuous oversight. The most damning e-mails that have been highlighted are all recent. - Eric Logan
You've got to look at the big picture, not just these emails; the overall scientific consensus. The AGW model is still dominant by far in the climate science community. If magazines like Nature, Science, Scientific American and New Scientist begin to report a substantive shift in that consensus, then maybe you will gain some traction. But not until then. - Sean McBride
scariest thing is that there are people foolish enough to believe that accusations of falsified records on climate change actually means that climate change is not real. the willingness to engage in wishful thinking is killing economies and people. history shows this has happened before and those who call themselves "climate skeptics" are contributing to the problem. - MikeAmundsen
Science isn't ruled by the "consensus", especially when it has been proven "science" has been politicized. If you actually look you will find enough so-called "scientists" that disagree with the Global Warming theory. The problem is, it has turned into a cult-like following where nobody can dare challenge their theories. - Spencer
Sean, thankfully my religion does not preclude the theory of evolution because evolution and creation are not mutually exclusive. Your assertion that the climate debate ended indicates either ignorance or duplicity on your part. Objective scientists are, in fact, appalled at the liberal attempts to side-step the scientific method for political and economic gain. They have, in fact,... more... - pitlord
But the real issue is, in light of the East Anglia CRU emails, how can you even uphold the integrity of peer-reviewed journals? See: http://ncwatch.typepad.com/media... Especially as they relate to climate change - pitlord
@p: we've been here before. you know that the actions of these scientists, while a key focus in the _politics_ of climate change, are a sideshow in the _science_ of it. any attempts to hold these idiots and their transgressions up in support of climate skepticism is either disingenuous, manipulative or both. - MikeAmundsen
Mike, are you saying that the admission that the climate science research was manipulated to support a preferred conclusion has no bearing on the science itself? - pitlord
p: sure am. the facts are the facts. cherry-picking them to fit a preferred outcome is a waste of time. scientists who "shade the truth" for some political end are a waste of space. the planet will continue to heat up, continue to run out of fossil fuels, continue to run out of fresh water no matter what lies scientists use to bolster their own argument. that some scientists are... more... - MikeAmundsen
That's the smartest argument I have heard. Now if you can just get the IPCC to agree to stop funding and covering up for scientists involved in this type of unscientific chicanery. We may have a chance for a functioning actual scientific peer review process. - Eric Logan
@Eric: yeah, scientific peer-review has been screwed up for decades - i suspect it's been even longer. history is littered w/ self-serving interests quashing contrary scientific work. i suspect IPCC is just as much a victim as the black-balled scientists who can't get funding for their work when it goes against the thinking of the committees responsible for review. like so many other... more... - MikeAmundsen
Mike++ :) Made several points I intended to make for me. - Sean McBride
<threadjack> If you are unfamiliar, Mike is astute, eloquent and quick-witted in a good discussion. If you are not subscribed to him, you should be</threadjack> - MVB (Curmudgeon of FF)
MVB: right back atcha, man. - MikeAmundsen
Mike and Mark -- two of my Friendfeed favorites. And Anthony Citrano (and quite a few others). Generally in the progressive libertarian or libertarian progressive camp, as I read them -- difficult to pigeonhole by conventional political categories because they are actually trying to think critically and creatively about the big issues. - Sean McBride
<love-fest>SB: how about pragmati-gressive-tarian? another handle i've been given is opinionated bastard. MVB has his handle setting properly, too[g]</love-fest> - MikeAmundsen
It's easy. You start by not believing anything anyone says and work from there. - MVB (Curmudgeon of FF)
I'm no scientist and I'm not part of the cover up... but could you tell me how I am wrong? http://friendfeed.com/jworthi... - Johnny Worthington
Add Johnny to "The List" Sean, although he doesn't engage often enough in a rousing political discussion. - MVB (Curmudgeon of FF)
Mark -- I visited Johnny's link above and was impressed by his commonsense summary of CO2 issues. I am going to bump him higher up on my list of Friendfeeders to pay attention to. Compared to Sarah Palin's understanding of science issues, he's an Einstein. :) - Sean McBride
Is the ego-centric circle jerk over yet? Please use the provided tissue to clean up your mess. >.> - pitlord
stay classy p. - MikeAmundsen
You mean like our former Vice President who thinks he's living 1984 and in charge of running the Ministry of Truth? - pitlord
Sean McBride
Thomas L. Friedman - Going Cheney on Climate - NYTimes.com - http://www.nytimes.com/glogin...
"When I see a problem that has even a 1 percent probability of occurring and is “irreversible” and potentially “catastrophic,” I buy insurance. That is what taking climate change seriously is all about. If we prepare for climate change by building a clean-power economy, but climate change turns out to be a hoax, what would be the result? Well, during a transition period, we would have higher energy prices. But gradually we would be driving battery-powered electric cars and powering more and more of our homes and factories with wind, solar, nuclear and second-generation biofuels. We would be much less dependent on oil dictators who have drawn a bull’s-eye on our backs; our trade deficit would improve; the dollar would strengthen; and the air we breathe would be cleaner. In short, as a country, we would be stronger, more innovative and more energy independent. But if we don’t prepare, and climate change turns out to be real, life on this planet could become a living hell. And that’s why I’m for doing the Cheney-thing on climate — preparing for 1 percent." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
Man, I hate Friedman so much. Even when he has the kernel of a good idea, he cannot help but write it in the most aggravating way possible. - Andrew C
lol, I've noticed you have an exceedingly low tolerance for anything Friedman. - Christopher Chung
Yeah, about the only thing he's been associated with that I approve of is, well, Matt Taibbi's epic takedown of him. - Andrew C
pitlord
"Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., ranking Republican on the House Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming, said Tuesday he is going to attend the Copenhagen conference to inform world leaders that despite any promises made by President Obama, no new laws will be passed in the United States until the 'scientific fascism' ends." Good for him. I will definitely consider moving to Wisconsin. - pitlord from Bookmarklet
"Scientific fascism" = science that Sensenbrenner doesn't vaguely understand. - Sean McBride
Sean McBride
30 ways in NML to say that Dick Armey was an Iraq War opponent - http://seanmcbride.posterous.com/30-ways...
Posted via email from Sean McBride's Posterous - Sean McBride from Posterous
Sean McBride
Paul Krugman - An Affordable Truth - NYTimes.com - http://www.nytimes.com/2009...
Paul Krugman - An Affordable Truth - NYTimes.com
"The acid rain controversy of the 1980s was in many respects a dress rehearsal for today’s fight over climate change. Then as now, right-wing ideologues denied the science. Then as now, industry groups claimed that any attempt to limit emissions would inflict grievous economic harm. But in 1990 the United States went ahead anyway with a cap-and-trade system for sulfur dioxide. And guess what. It worked, delivering a sharp reduction in pollution at lower-than-predicted cost. Curbing greenhouse gases will be a much bigger and more complex task — but we’re likely to be surprised at how easy it is once we get started." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
Krugman , Stuck his foot in his mouth on this one. The acid rain controversy was one where the skeptics changed the political consensus. Acidification of lakes was proven to be caused by the soil. - Eric Logan
The EPA vs. Edward Krug http://www.sepp.org/Archive... - Eric Logan
From Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki... "Overall, the Program's cap and trade program has been immensely successful in achieving its goals. Since the 1990s, SO2 emissions have dropped 40%, and according to the Pacific Research Institute, acid rain levels have dropped 65% since 1976. In 2007, total SO2 emissions were 8.9 million tons, achieving the... more... - Sean McBride
And: article(Aurae Beidler; The harmful effects of acid rain; suite101.com; February 22, 2008 http://climate-change.suite101.com/article...) "Acid rain has a negative effect on plants and animals. Once the acid gets into the water cycle it can cause the acidification of lakes and streams. The National Surface Water Survey (NSWS) identified over a... more... - Sean McBride
I will give him credit for one thing that he stated correctly it was definitely a dress rehearsal. There are numerous scientific reports that revisited this acidification question the scientific consensus today is that landscape changes cause changes in watershed PH. Krug who was the scientist in charge of the NAPAP report at the time said and continues to say it was a hoax.... more... - Eric Logan
The abstract of the first article hardly sounds like a denunciation of the idea that acid rain causes lakes and streams to become acidic: "The onset of acidification for most paleolimnological study lakes in the Adirondacks corresponded temporally with both the onset or increase in acidic deposition and also the occurrence of major landscape disturbances associated with logging and... more... - Victor Ganata
Eric -- I did some quicky and dirty scanning of the background on acid rain and Edward Krug, and could find very little to upset the conventional wisdom on the subject. Acid rain affects the soil surrounding lakes and other bodies of water, which in turn in increases their acidification. I am always open to unconventional, minority and contrarian views on all subjects (as you know, I am... more... - Sean McBride
Despite the reductions there has been no significant improvement in lake acidification. Now they are planning to tackle Nox emissions. I understand this is a moving target and the environment is an actual concern, Where we focus our resources to tackle this problem is also significant. http://www.hubbardbrookfoundation.org/fileman... - Eric Logan
Sean, There is a lot of testimony given before the Senate relating to the SO2 program in this document. Section IV. The history of the acid rain program does not support claims that substantial cuts in power plant emissions of CO2 can be accomplished inexpensively, including factors that mitigated some of the initial cost projections. Today's CO2 declaration is designed of course to circumvent the Senate. http://cei.org/pdf/6010.pdf - Eric Logan
The HUGE difference is that CO2 is not a toxic gas!!! in fact is very positive for agriculture, in fact during the Jurassic period when there was a much larger biodiversity it was 4 to 5 times higher than now..... - ovigia
Sure CO2 is toxic, if you get to high enough levels (You start getting central nervous system effects around 1% concentration--10,000 ppm, but that may be mostly from the concomitant decrease in oxygen concentration) But I realize that's usually not what people are talking about. - Victor Ganata
After spending billions taking sulfates out of coal and gasoline to prevent acid rain. One of the solutions proposed to mitigate global warming is the use of sulfates in the atmosphere. Following the Mount Pinatubo example. Truth is stranger than fiction. http://knowledge.allianz.com/en... - Eric Logan
It gets better A Canadian study found that removing SO2 from ship exhausts actually contributed to global warming. The process in question sea water scrubbing is used by the shipping industry. The scrubbers are produced by a subsidiary of B.P. called Krystallon. It is alleged to produce CO2 "If you scrub out one kilogram of SO2, you produce 2.75 kg of CO2. Naturally B.P. denies this. http://www.canada.com/theprov... - Eric Logan
From which I conclude that we still know very little about the full complexity of the natural world, and all its subtle interactions, but that we nonetheless should make public policy on the basis of our current best understanding of that world. Do the best we can with the best knowledge we have at the moment. Play the odds. - Sean McBride
Casino owners depend on the odds. http://healthandenergy.com/sulfur_... - Eric Logan
We need to try to find a way to reduce both carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere. - Sean McBride
Welcome to the new national Casino don't forget your players reward card. http://www.chicagoclimatex.com/ - Eric Logan
Sean McBride
Amazon.com: Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them) (9780061173936): Bart D. Ehrman: Books - http://www.amazon.com/Jesus-I...
Amazon.com: Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them) (9780061173936): Bart D. Ehrman: Books
"Picking up where Bible expert Bart Ehrman's New York Times bestseller Misquoting Jesus left off, Jesus, Interrupted addresses the larger issue of what the New Testament actually teaches—and it's not what most people think. Here Ehrman reveals what scholars have unearthed: * The authors of the New Testament have diverging views about who Jesus was and how salvation works * The New Testament contains books that were forged in the names of the apostles by Christian writers who lived decades later * Jesus, Paul, Matthew, and John all represented fundamentally different religions * Established Christian doctrines—such as the suffering messiah, the divinity of Jesus, and the trinity—were the inventions of still later theologians These are not idiosyncratic perspectives of just one modern scholar. As Ehrman skillfully demonstrates, they have been the standard and widespread views of critical scholars across a full spectrum of denominations and traditions. Why is it most people have never heard such things?" - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
I like the other Ehrman books I have read. Actually, established Christian doctrines like the common understanding of divinity and the trinity doctrine being an invention of later theologians is told everyday as a part of Jehovah's Witnesses door to door theocratic ministry. - Eric Logan
Steve
Hurricane Expert Rips Climate Fears: 'There has been an unrelenting quarter century of one-sided indoctrination' | Climate Depot - http://www.climatedepot.com/a...
Had I not devoted my entire career of over half-a-century to the study and forecasting of meteorological and climate events I would have likely been concerned over the possibility of humans causing serious global climate degradation. - Steve from Bookmarklet
Rising levels of CO_2 are not near the threat these alarmists have portrayed them to be. There has yet to be a honest and broad scientific debate on the basic science of CO_2 's influence on global temperature. The global climate models predicting large amounts of global warming for a doubling of CO_2 are badly flawed. They should never have been used to establish government climate policy. - Steve
The disastrous economic consequences of restricting CO_2 emissions from the present by as much as 20 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050 (as being proposed in Copenhagen) have yet to be digested by the general public. Such CO_2 output decreases would cause very large increases in our energy costs, a lowering of our standard of living, and do nothing of significance to improve our... more... - Steve
A large majority of the world's leading climate scientists disagree. - Sean McBride
True, but does that mean they are correct in their assumptions? - Steve
Since I am not one of the world's leading climate scientists, and am unable to critique their research and thinking in an intelligent way, the most rational course is to put more credence, for the time being, in the consensus expert view on these matters than in the minority view. - Sean McBride
Many of those in the minority have not been given a proper platform. One needs to evaluate all sides of an issue before drawing conclusions. - Steve
They have the same platform as everyone else: peer-reviewed scientific journals. Sometimes the minority is simply wrong on scientific matters. - Sean McBride
Given some of the new "information" that has been brought to light, it seems as if that peer review may have been pretty subjective rather than objective in some cases. - Steve
Good point about believing the mainstream consensus if you have no expertise in the field, Sean. Here is a good article about how not to get blinded with science (and that is point one): http://ff.im/cnafu - Eivind
There has been no attempt to hide the agenda this is about environmental and social reform, climate change is just the current rallying cry. ===> The most profound danger to world peace in the coming years will stem not from the irrational acts of states or individuals but from the legitimate demands of the world's dispossessed. Of these poor and disenfranchised, the majority live a... more... - Eric Logan
Sean McBride
John Markoff - A Stanford Reunion - Artificial Intelligence’s Early Years - NYTimes.com - http://www.nytimes.com/2009...
John Markoff - A Stanford Reunion - Artificial Intelligence’s Early Years - NYTimes.com
"The scientists and engineers who worked at the laboratory constitute an extraordinary Who’s Who in the computing world. Dr. McCarthy coined the term artificial intelligence in the 1950s. Before coming to SAIL he developed the LISP programming language and invented the time-sharing approach to computers. Mr. Earnest designed the first spell-checker and is rightly described as the father of social networking and blogging for his contribution of the finger command that made it possible to tell where the laboratory’s computer users were and what they were doing." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
"The reunion also gave a hint of what is to come. During an afternoon symposium at the reunion, several of the current SAIL researchers showed a startling video called “Chaos” taken from the Stanford Autonomous Helicopter project. An exercise in machine learning, the video shows a model helicopter making a remarkable series of maneuvers that would not be possible by a human pilot. The... more... - Sean McBride
The old hackers and crypto-men. Being covered by NYT. - Fulaan, inna Hebel
An amazing collection of visionaries. - Sean McBride
Most people don't know how much these guys (and many more) have done for modern society - Fulaan, inna Hebel
Sean McBride
The Looming US-Israel Split - The Daily Dish | By Andrew Sullivan - http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_dai...
"That's the likeliest consequence of the current awful choices the West has with respect to Iran's nuclear weapon capacity. In a diplomatic war-game at Harvard, various experienced officials tried to game out future negotiations, sanctions and alliances. Iran's revolutionary guard junta, which now runs almost all the country's key institutions, wins every time. Broad sanctions won't work; specific sanctions bring Russia and China again to Iran's defense; and in the end, the US comes to the obvious conclusion that, absent launching a war we can neither afford nor accomplish, the best strategy is containment of an Iran with nuclear latency or even a few nuclear bombs. This is certainly no riskier a strategy with respect to America's vital interests than letting Pakistan have a nuke. But it leaves an obvious problem: Israel." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
"One reason I have been focusing on Israel lately is because I can see this conflict coming and do not believe it can be contained or managed without a more open and honest public dialogue than the cramped and emotional one that occurs in Washington. The truth is: Israel and the US have very different interests with respect to Iran, and if Israel launches a war on Iran, against US wishes, then the alliance will never be the same." - Sean McBride
I've thought for some time that Israel is on a collision course with the entire Western democratic world and with the United States in particular regarding fundamental values and interests. I can easily name a few dozen very smart Jewish and Israeli minds who agree with me. It's surprising to see Andrew Sullivan moving towards this point of view, but welcome to the club and better late... more... - Sean McBride
Given Israels couple hundred A-Bombs hard to fault Iran for wanting a couple.. just for balance but if anybody roughs up Iran China spank and I'm sure that plays big in DC if not in Israel - WarLord
Sean McBride
Think Progress » Inhofe’s Hoax: Senator Distorts Meteorological Study To Show Support For His Global Warming Denial - http://thinkprogress.org/2009...
"The year 2009 is likely to rank in the top 10 warmest on record since the beginning of instrumental climate records in 1850, according to data sources compiled by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). The global combined sea surface and land surface air temperature for 2009 (January–October) is currently estimated at 0.44°C ± 0.11°C (0.79°F ± 0.20°F) above the 1961–1990 annual average of 14.00°C/57.2°F. The current nominal ranking of 2009, which does not account for uncertainties in the annual averages, places it as the fifth-warmest year. The decade of the 2000s (2000–2009) was warmer than the decade spanning the 1990s (1990–1999), which in turn was warmer than the 1980s (1980–1989)." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
"Inhofe apparently either hadn’t read the WMO report or was intentionally vague in his wording so as not to state the organization’s conclusion. But Inhofe also was wrong about The Guardian. The UK newspaper joined with 56 other newspapers in 45 countries to run the same front-page editorial yesterday, urging action on climate change. Two of the three citations Inhofe used to validate... more... - Sean McBride
Sean McBride
"An article in its Internet-distributed pamphlet "The Jewish Voice" includes a call to "execute targeted operations against the evildoers, invade Civil Administration offices and ransack them, as well as operate violently [sic] against the Palestinians, deepen the refusal to serve in the army and not recognize Israeli courts." The article was written by Rabbi Yosef Elitzur of the "Od Yosef Hai" yeshiva in Yitzhar." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
"Yes, a rabbi. A rabbi who would violate Jewish law, Israeli law, every law, because he worships the golden calf of land to the exclusion of every other Jewish value. I don't know Elitzur, but I know his mentor, Yitzhak Ginzburg, who is a true racist and fascist, the spiritual mentor of a movement that is the Jewish equivalent of Hezbollah. I've been following these guys for years; the... more... - Sean McBride
Dov Weisglass (former Ariel Sharon chief of staff): "What Sharon understood, and Olmert after him, is now becoming apparent to the current government: Good or bad, just or unjust, that is the reality. No one in the world agrees to Israel's presence in a majority of the Judea and Samaria territories and the continued construction there. Israeli persistence will bring upon it diplomatic... more... - Sean McBride
Interesting, that word "evildoers" --also used by George W. Bush and his fellow Christian Zionist ideologues. - Sean McBride
Sean McBride
EU says Jerusalem 'future capital of two states' - Yahoo! News - http://news.yahoo.com/s...
EU says Jerusalem 'future capital of two states' - Yahoo! News
"EU nations agreed on Tuesday that Jerusalem should be the capital of both Israel and a future Palestinian state, assuaging Israeli anger over earlier mention of east Jerusalem as the Palestinian capital. Jerusalem should provide "the future capital of the two states," as part of a negotiated settlement, European Union foreign ministers agreed in a text released after talks in Brussels." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
Eric Logan
Rupert Murdoch: Journalism and Freedom - WSJ.com - http://online.wsj.com/article...
Rupert Murdoch: Journalism and Freedom - WSJ.com
We are at a time when many news enterprises are shutting down or scaling back. No doubt you will hear some tell you that journalism is in dire shape, and the triumph of digital is to blame. My message is just the opposite. The future of journalism is more promising than ever—limited only by editors and producers unwilling to fight for their readers and viewers, or government using its heavy hand either to overregulate or subsidize us. From the beginning, newspapers have prospered for one reason: the trust that comes from representing their readers' interests and giving them the news that's important to them. That means covering the communities where they live, exposing government or business corruption, and standing up to the rich and powerful. Technology now allows us to do this on a much greater scale. That means we have the means to reach billions of people who until now have had no honest or independent sources of the information they need to rise in society, hold their... more... - Eric Logan from Bookmarklet
"the trust that comes from representing their readers' interests and giving them the news that's important to them. " -- and yet he runs Fox News and the WSJ, two massively dishonest media sources. It's a good thing I've had a lot of irony practice over the last eight years or my eyes might have rolled straight out of my head. - Andrew C
Will be interesting to see how it all plays out. The genie is not going back into the bottle unless the internet becomes a lot more controlled through regressive copy right regulation. - Eric Logan
I find Rupert Murdoch's media properties to be appalling, but oddly enough I agree with him in this respect: intellectual property rights matter greatly, and generators of intellectual property (including high-quality news and investigative journalism) need to be paid for their efforts. High-quality news and investigative journalism are not free -- far from it. - Sean McBride
Sean McBride
Goldman, Goldman Everywhere: Christopher Bateman | Vanity Fair - http://www.vanityfair.com/online...
Goldman, Goldman Everywhere: Christopher Bateman | Vanity Fair
"As Vanity Fair contributor and historian Niall Ferguson loves to point out, the tremendous political influence of bankers in capitalist democracies is no new development. But the pervasive connections of Goldman Sachs in the United States government—along with the widespread belief that Goldman got particularly and shamefully favorable treatment in the bailout at the expense of taxpayers—has caused many to look closer at the reach of Goldman's tentacles. Building on work by The Huffington Post, the London Times, and other sleuths, Vanity Fair compiled a list of high-ranking officials in governments across the globe who have significant links to the bank, as well as current Goldman personnel who have held noteworthy positions in politics. Even vigilant Goldman watchdogs may spot a few unfamiliar names on the list." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
The chart is to small for me to read on my screen. - Eric Logan
Eric -- I downloaded the image to my drive and then read it with my local image viewer using the zoom function -- well worth the effort. (I am converting the data in the image to simple semantic assertions.) - Sean McBride
Sean McBride
Little Green Footballs - Gibbs: Climategate is 'Silly' - http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article...
"The only reason the climate change denial industry is working so hard to promote the false idea that there’s a “debate” going on in the scientific community is to cast doubt and spread confusion among the public. No scientific theory is ever considered to be “100% certain.” But suppose you were about to take a flight, and a mechanic told you that there was a 95%+ chance that the airplane would crash. Would you just get on the plane anyway? That’s exactly the situation we’re in with human-caused global warming. The scientific consensus is overwhelming, and it’s supported by mountains of data from multiple sources, all of it in agreement. Does it make sense to say that because we don’t have absolute certainty, we should just sit back and do nothing — and let the problem get worse and worse until it’s too late to do anything about it?" - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
Sean McBride
Conceptual Origami: Search, Discovery, and Insight via Emergent Semantics (Alexander Stojanovic) - http://conceptualorigami.blogspot.com/2009...
Conceptual Origami: Search, Discovery, and Insight via Emergent Semantics (Alexander Stojanovic)
"I am very pleased to be able to announce that Microsoft Semantic Engine, a group that I founded and led up through the current PDC 2009, has finally been made visible to the general public. The blog linked above called it the "hidden gem" of PDC 2009. That was very kind of him. In the two years that we have been building this technology, our goals have remained the same: to make semantically-enhanced search, discovery, and organization autonomic, scale invariant, and immediately useable by anyone used to search engines." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
Sean McBride
Posted via email from Sean McBride's Posterous - Sean McBride from Posterous
Steven Perez
Chris Hedges: Liberals Are Useless - Chris Hedges' Columns - Truthdig - http://www.truthdig.com/report...
Chris Hedges: Liberals Are Useless - Chris Hedges' Columns - Truthdig
"Liberals are a useless lot. They talk about peace and do nothing to challenge our permanent war economy. They claim to support the working class, and vote for candidates that glibly defend the North American Free Trade Agreement. They insist they believe in welfare, the right to organize, universal health care and a host of other socially progressive causes, and will not risk stepping out of the mainstream to fight for them. The only talent they seem to possess is the ability to write abject, cloying letters to Barack Obama—as if he reads them—asking the president to come back to his “true” self. This sterile moral posturing, which is not only useless but humiliating, has made America’s liberal class an object of public derision." - Steven Perez from Bookmarklet
"I am not disappointed in Obama. I don’t feel betrayed. I don’t wonder when he is going to be Obama. I did not vote for the man. I vote socialist, which in my case meant Ralph Nader, but could have meant Cynthia McKinney. How can an organization with the oxymoronic title Progressives for Obama even exist? Liberal groups like these make political satire obsolete. Obama was and is a... more... - Steven Perez
I think that the writer of this article made one mistake: he should have used the word "Democrat" in place of "liberal". - Steven Perez
Let's just give up and start over. - aldenoneil
Obama was and is a Blue Dog Dem surrounded by Blue Dog Dem advisors, he never was a liberal in any meanigful sense and the liberal Blog-o-sphere has been giddy over him for nothing to do with policy or politics. And yes the liberals have become as pointless as the MSM - WarLord
Obama as a Senator was markedly left of the actual Blue Dogs, WarLord. Let's not hyperbolize. And I feel my initial optimism was justified. He was a constitutional scholar and a community organizer; he has all the reasons in the world to know what the right thing to do is. - Andrew C
Yes, I agree, Andrew. Despite the fact that I've waited and seen, I'm still taking a wait and see approach. I'm not being sarcastic. - aldenoneil
So far FISA, Wire Taps and Rendition he has not done the "right" thing, I'm sorry to say that the facts of governance have not lived up to the promise nevr mind kicking the AFPAK can down the road - WarLord
"Nader voter claims liberals are useless." - Jim Norris
@WarLord - I wasn't saying he did do 'the right thing' in all cases, but the overwhelming cynicism from people like this guy ("Obama is just like the other guy and everyone should have seen it") was and is ridiculous. - Andrew C
After the last ten years of watching congressional Democrats bend over backwards for Dubya, Jim, I'm at a loss to see the error that this writer makes, other than his mismatched labels. - Steven Perez
Quote: "He's just another Chicago politician. Why would you expect him to be different?" - MVB (Curmudgeon of Friendfeed) October 2008 - MVB (Curmudgeon of FF)
Mark got another prediction right. One might add that Obama is just another AIPAC and Goldman Sachs politician -- mightier political institutions than Chicago. - Sean McBride
First of all, everyone should go back to their textbook definition of liberals, socialists, democrats, whatever label you want to use. Once you have defined that liberal or progressive in the USA means right around the global center of the politcal spectrum, you will see that of course Obama is, in a way, the same as his predecessors, but like Andrew mentioned, he used to be left... more... - Rene Wirtz
And don't forget my prediction for the Congressional elections in 2010. Economy still in the tank, high unemployment... Well, you see where I I went. - MVB (Curmudgeon of FF)
Liberals are like hippies; neither contributes, just bitches. (Former Ron Paul delegate that has felt the hate of politics) - Jackye Chan
I agree with MVB that 2010 is looking kinda bleak for the majority that the Dems now have, even though, having the Reps being in the majority will only make things worse, because it means that nothing, absolutely nothing, will get accomplished. - Rene Wirtz
I'm not disappointed in Obama, but I voted for him despite preferring John Edwards. I think the only people who are disappointed were those who voted for him believing in the rhetoric but not understanding the nuances of policy. Sound familiar? - Piaw Na
Rene hit it right on the head: "liberals" are in the middle or to the right, "conservatives" are way on the right. Makes you really think hard about where teabaggers are on the political spectrum. - Steven Perez
Steven, I was hoping they were under it... - MVB (Curmudgeon of FF)
"We may lose if we step outside the mainstream, but at least we will salvage our self-esteem and integrity." - Jim Norris
Pahlin and her wacky tea bagging conspiracy theorists will be the only thing that saves the Democratic Majority. Unemployment is structural and long lasting. And with the Dems too busy playing deficit hawk to notice by rights they should be punished but the two party system is rapidly devolving into Democrats Vs Blue Dogs... - WarLord
Spencer
EPA: Greenhouse gases endanger human health - Yahoo! News - http://news.yahoo.com/s...
EPA: Greenhouse gases endanger human health - Yahoo! News
Something else for them to tax. When will people realize how dangerous this administration is? - Spencer from Bookmarklet
Does smoking cigarettes endanger human health? Dumping flourocarbons into the atmosphere? Dumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere? What does the best science say? - Sean McBride
The "best science" isn't valid anymore now we know politics and so-called science is mixed, starting with the global warming hoax. You don't need "science" to know what this administration wants to do with more regulation like this. - Spencer
On which scientist do you rely most heavily for your understanding of climate change science, and which is the most important paper he or she has published on the subject of anthropogenic global warming? - Sean McBride
This article isn't about the Global Warming hoax, it's about the administration taking even more control over something.....again. As you do with every thread, you want to avert the issue and get into the specifics of something which has nothing to do with the real issue. There are no such thing as scientists anymore when it comes to global warming. Political hacks is more like it. - Spencer
Spencer -- do you have any scientific basis on which to decide whether greenhouse gases do or do not endanger human health? And if they do endanger human health, shouldn't they be regulated? - Sean McBride
Well considering humans expel CO2, I would hardly call them a "danger". No, the government does not need to regulate it. This new "regulation" is a way for Obama to get around legislation that won't pass. I can sit here and name thousands and thousands of things that are "dangerous", should the government regulate all of them? Heck, even oxygen can be dangerous. Lets have Obama regulate that too! - Spencer
Spencer -- are there any dangerous pollutants created by human activity that you think should be regulated by federal, state or local governments? - Sean McBride
Steven Perez
‘Mosaic’: The Real Reason Behind Obama’s Afghan Surge - Truthdig - http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth...
‘Mosaic’: The Real Reason Behind Obama’s Afghan Surge - Truthdig
"Something just doesn’t add up about the stated logic of sending 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan, says Jamal Dajani, who has a theory about the president’s real reason for escalating the war." - Steven Perez from Bookmarklet
Well, someone has to protect the pipeline construction and the poppy harvest... - MVB (Curmudgeon of FF)
making bombs and bullets and HumVees and tanks is job creation too - WarLord
Pakistan's nukes are the main target. - Sean McBride
We didn't go into Pakistan (when it was obvious they were the only M.E. country to openly support the Taliban) because too many of our manufacturing jobs were being sent there. Now we got Iran surrounded. Hooray for war! - Jackye Chan
Sean McBride
A vision of computing from Microsoft's future thinker - CNN.com - http://edition.cnn.com/2009...
"In the next 10 years, the way people interact with computers will wildly change. Hand gestures will be as common as the click of a keyboard, and an assortment of documents will be selected not with a mouse, but with a scan of the eye. "Today, most people's interaction is through a screen -- whether they touch it, type it, point or click, it's still just graphical user interface," says Craig Mundie, chief research and strategy officer of Microsoft." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
Sean McBride
Think Progress » Right-Wing Billionaire David Koch Funding SwiftBoat Campaign Against Global Warming Science - http://thinkprogress.org/2009...
Think Progress » Right-Wing Billionaire David Koch Funding SwiftBoat Campaign Against Global Warming Science
"The National Academy of Sciences, the US Global Change Research Program, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have all come to the same conclusion: “that carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel use and the loss of carbon-sink capacity in heavily timbered forests are increasing temperatures and making oceans more acidic.” David Koch’s Koch Industries derives much of its profit from its oil refineries, one of the major emitters of carbon dioxide, and from its George-Pacific timber subsidiary, one of the largest contributors to the loss of carbon-sink capacity. So while it’s clear Koch’s bottom line is in conflict with the addressing the world’s climate crisis, it should also be clear that he is no champion of science — no matter how many halls he buys at the Smithsonian." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
Another reason why I keep saying capitalism has failed: almost never do large corporations and conservative billionaires look beyond their bottom line. "So what if I'm killing the earth, it's gonna happen when I'm dead, so who cares. In the meantime, I shall live it up!" "So what my employees don't have health care, I have perfectly good health care and I don't give a crap about anyone else." There's only few that actually do look out for the next generations, Bill Gates comes to mind. - Rene Wirtz
There always seems to come a point when intelligent libertarians figure out that unbridled capitalism can become a highly destructive force. And that is when they start searching for progressive methods and policies to rein in vulture capitalists for the sake of the public interest. - Sean McBride
And that is happening now as well, the health care bill as an example. Much more government regulation and control and of course the counter reaction is as predictable: socialism, bad! In my estimation the tipping point is nearing really fast (or it may have already passed) before the big corporations start imploding, and thereby completely destroying the US economy. China and India are ready to take over. - Rene Wirtz
Steven Perez
Adviser: Obama plans to launch Bin Laden hunt anew | Raw Story - http://rawstory.com/2009...
"The United States will launch a new effort to track down Osama bin Laden who is believed to be hiding in the mountains along the Afghan-Pakistan border, a senior US official said on Sunday. Intelligence reports suggest the Al-Qaeda chief "is somewhere inside north Waziristan, sometimes on the Pakistani side of the border, sometimes on the Afghan side of the border," said national security adviser James Jones. Asked if President Barack Obama's administration planned a fresh attempt to go after Al-Qaeda's leader, Jones said: "I think so."" - Steven Perez from Bookmarklet
"I THINK SO"?!?!?!? You need to think about that?!?!? - Steven Perez
It seems to be difficult to keep infusing energy and life into this story. Skeptical minds might even begin to wonder if the government itself has known for a long time that OBL wasn't behind 9/11. (The FBI apparently never believed that he was.) - Sean McBride
Sean McBride
Dr. Dobb's | Rethinking Artificial Intelligence | December 7, 2009 - http://www.ddj.com/archite...
"The new project, launched with an initial $5 million grant and a five-year timetable, is called the Mind Machine Project, or MMP, a loosely bound collaboration of about two dozen professors, researchers, students and postdocs. According to Neil Gershenfeld, one of the leaders of MMP and director of MIT's Center for Bits and Atoms, one of the project's goals is to create intelligent machines -- "whatever that means."" - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
"The project is "revisiting fundamental assumptions" in all of the areas encompassed by the field of AI, including the nature of the mind and of memory, and how intelligence can be manifested in physical form, says Gershenfeld, professor of media arts and sciences. "Essentially, we want to rewind to 30 years ago and revisit some ideas that had gotten frozen," he says, adding that the new group hopes to correct "fundamental mistakes" made in AI research over the years." - Sean McBride
"And the third focus of the new research has to do with what they describe as "body": "Computer science and physical science diverged decades ago," Gershenfeld says. Computers are programmed by writing a sequence of lines of code, but "the mind doesn't work that way. In the mind, everything happens everywhere all the time." A new approach to programming, called RALA (short for... more... - Sean McBride
Sean McBride
OpEdNews - Obama Lied: Taliban Did Not Refuse to Hand Over Bin Laden (Ralph Lopez) - http://www.opednews.com/article...
"Obama slipped past a real doozy Tuesday night when he said the Taliban refused to hand over bin Laden. It just ain't so. They tried three times to open negotiations for this, but Bush refused each time. He wanted to bomb people so bad it hurt." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
hmmm - Mona Nomura
More accurately, by August of 2001, those behind the Bush admin had come to the conclusion that the Taliban-led government would not be an obedient surrogate to the directions of G8 energy co's, and would not be unseated easily by the Massoud-led, western-friendly forces in the north. Not without US troops on the ground. So, it really didn't matter if Bin Laden even existed - the... more... - Cole Jolley
Sean McBride
Scientist’s Himalayan mission provides unwelcome proof: glaciers are dying - Times Online - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol...
Scientist’s Himalayan mission provides unwelcome proof: glaciers are dying - Times Online
"Inching over the treacherous surface of the Rathong glacier, almost 5,000 metres (16,400ft) high in the eastern Himalayas, Dr Shresth Tayal stooped to inspect a 7m steel rod he buried vertically in the ice six months ago. After a decade studying Himalayan glaciers, he had expected to find at least half the rod exposed — an alarming enough indication of how fast the Rathong is melting — but even he was surprised by what he found last week. “Six metres in six months,” he cried, breathing hard in the thin mountain air as The Times and the rest of his team stepped gingerly between hidden crevasses and gushing rivulets of freshly melted ice. “It’s pathetic,” he said. “The glacier is dying.”" - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
"India's own skeptical environment industry" A State-of-Art Review of Glacial Studies, Glacial Retreat and Climate Change - V.K.Raina, Ex. Deputy Director General, Geological Survey of India http://moef.nic.in/downloa... - Eric Logan
Sorry folks -- catching up on Sean's feed. - Mona Nomura
Sean McBride
Obama Steals Bush’s Speechwriters | The Progressive (Matthew Rothschild) - http://www.progressive.org/wx12020...
Obama Steals Bush’s Speechwriters | The Progressive (Matthew Rothschild)
"If you closed your eyes during much of the President’s speech on Afghanistan Tuesday night and just listened to the words, you easily could have concluded that George W. Bush was still in the Oval Office." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
It's still the same problem... just with no new answers... Cause there isn't any... - Johnny Worthington
Sean McBride
Novelties - Multiple Screens Built for Textbooks as E-Books - NYTimes.com - http://www.nytimes.com/2009...
Novelties - Multiple Screens Built for Textbooks as E-Books - NYTimes.com
"Now there is a new approach that may adapt well to textbook pages: two-screen e-book readers with a traditional e-paper display on one screen and a liquid-crystal display on the other to render graphics like science animations in color. The dual screens are linked by a central processor so that, for example, a link on the e-paper display can open on the color screen. A two-screen device called the eDGe will be released by enTourage Systems in February for $490, said Doug Atkinson, vice president of marketing and business development for the company, based in McLean, Va." - Sean McBride from Bookmarklet
"Sarah Rotman Epps, an analyst at Forrester Research in Cambridge, Mass., said that the enTourage device was part of the next generation of e-readers, which would be hybrids. “They won’t just be a netbook or a tablet or an e-reader,” Ms. Epps said, “but a combination that will bend the categories consumers expect from electronics.”" - Sean McBride
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook