"Research results published through Open Access on the Internet are available for anyone to read and download. Researchers who receive funding from Formas from 2010 and onwards must guarantee that their research findings will be available through Open Access within six months of publication. Researchers may either publish in journals with an Open Access practice or those that archive published articles in large public access databases. The Open Access regulations currently only apply to scientifically peer-reviewed text published in scientific journals and conference reports. The regulations do not currently apply to monographs or book chapters. Funding to cover publication costs in Open Access journals can be included in research project applications as a direct cost."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
After the gold rush: MOOCs are augmenting rather than replacing formal educational models | Impact of Social Sciences - http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impacto...
Conclusion: "The evidence, both ours and that of others, clearly suggests that disseminating research results via OA would be more cost-effective than subscription or toll access publishing. In an all-OA world, it seems likely that the net benefits of Gold OA would exceed those of Green OA, although Green OA would have a higher benefit/cost ratio. However, we are not in an all-OA world yet, nor anywhere near it. The most affordable and cost-effective means of moving towards OA in the meantime is through Green OA, which can be adopted unilaterally at the funder, institutional, sectoral and national levels at little cost. Moreover, Green OA may well be the most immediate and cost-effective way to support knowledge transfer and enable innovation across the economy."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
still no love, eg querying for doi:10.5061/dryad.89735cr0 (known hit http://europepmc.org/article...) Ideas? Do I just have my syntax wrong? State of finding attribution to datasets is worse than I thought :(
- Heather Piwowar
Can do this type of search on PLOS articles, thank goodness. Which matters because PLOS has an open Search API. DEAR REST OF SCHOLARSHIP WE NEED SEARCH APIS FOR ALL ARTICLES! AND THEY HAVE TO BE ABLE TO FIND LINKS! http://www.plosone.org/search...
- Heather Piwowar
Unless I've misunderstood the question, http://tinyurl.com/cnbu84b seems to shows a Google search using the site:URL operator plus the search term finding the text you are looking for. Any good?
- Seb Schmoller
Alas Google's terms of use don't let me harvest and use those results in ways that I need to. No open api. But good for some uses, thanks for the reminder.
- Heather Piwowar
"The real opportunity, I think, is in trying to build longer arcs. Now that the cycle of new is eating itself in a race to ever-faster, there's a bigger chance to make long term change by consistently focusing on what works (and what's important), not what's new and merely shiny. What's important, what's always important, is useful change."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
Just out today (22/11). Houghton & Swan explain that Green #OA "provides the most affordable and cost-effective means of moving to OA". Conclusion based below. - http://www.cfses.com/project...
"The evidence, both ours and that of others, clearly suggests that disseminating research results via OA would be more cost-effective than subscription or toll access publishing. In an all-OA world, it seems likely that the net benefits of Gold OA would exceed those of Green OA. However, we are not in an all-OA world yet, nor are we likely to be in such a world in the foreseeable future. The most affordable and cost-effective means of moving towards OA in the meantime is through Green OA, which can be adopted unilaterally at the funder, institutional, sectoral and national levels at little cost. Moreover, Green OA may well be the most immediate and cost effective way to support knowledge transfer and enable innovation across the economy."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
The "tax-avoiding, morality-free monopsony that is Amazon", which is "a good place to shop" but "a very oppressive business" that "has got the whole (publishing) business frightened". [Excerpt from a speech in the House of Lords by Conservative Peer Ralph Lucas below.] - http://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords...
"I want to be sure that the new arrangements have sharp enough teeth and enough ability to act on their own decision to deal with that tax-avoiding, morality-free monopsony that is Amazon. It is a very good place to shop, but it is a very oppressive business. It has extraordinary contracts with its suppliers. Its arrangements with its Marketplace sellers must breach something, but I have, in the past six months, been unable to find a single major UK publisher who was willing to have tea in the Lords to tell me what they think of Amazon. It has got the whole business frightened."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
Though I detest the title of this piece by Eric Van de Velde about the forces at work in scholarly publishing, I like the analysis. - http://scitechsociety.blogspot.co.uk/2012...
"Almost 3K words in this NYT piece on MOOCs, but couldn’t spare a single one to mention Siemens, Downes, Couros, Cormier… Did you recognize any of those names? They’re the people who actually invented massive open online courses (MOOCs)".
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
Data journalism from the FT's @xtophercook sheds a clear light on the GCSE English debacle. One of Cook's key questions is excerpted below. - http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata...
Did a child in 2012 do as well as a similarly taught child did in 2011? I would like to see graphs showing the probability of children of different ability ranges getting a C, say, in 2011 and 2012. That would cut to the heart of it.
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
The big problem in economics is that it really matters in which journals you publish. Dan Scott hits the nail on the head in Open Economics. Long excerpt below. - http://openeconomics.net/2012...
"For now, the funding mechanisms are the same and the requirement to publish in journals with a reputation is still paramount. Until now, arguments against open access publishing have tended to focus on quality issues. The argument goes that the premier (subscription) journals take the best submissions and then there is a cascade downwards through second tier journals (which may or may not be subscription-based) until you get to a pile of leftover papers that can only be published by the author paying a fee to some sort of piratical publisher. This does not stand much scrutiny. Plenty of subscription-based journals are average and have been churned out by publishers looking to beef up their portfolios and justify charging ever-larger sums. Good research gets unnecessarily dumped by leading journals because they adhere to review policies dating from the print age when limited pagination forced them to be highly selective. Other academics, as we have seen at Social Sciences Directory,...
more...
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
Important report > "Understanding low and discontinued Internet use amongst young people in Britain" - this blog post by the authors links the the full report. Concluding para excerpted below: - http://blogs.oii.ox.ac.uk/policy...
"A good start might be to simply acknowledge that this group actually exists, and to adopt a more nuanced understanding of what it means to actually use the Internet in a meaningful way."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
"This research investigates the current awareness of, and participation in, the open content movement at one UK institution for higher education. The open content movement and the open educational resources can be seen as potential methods for reducing time and cost of technology-enhanced learning developments; however, its sustainability and, to some degree, its success are dependent on critical mass and large-scale participation. Teaching staff were invited to respond to a questionnaire. Respondents (n= 59) were open to the idea of sharing their own content and, similar to other studies, demonstrated existing practices of sharing resources locally amongst colleagues; however, there was little formal, large-scale sharing using suitable licenses. The data gathered concurs with other research suggesting a lack of awareness to the Creative Commons licenses as well as a lack of participation in large open educational resource repositories."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
Not before time. ORCID ID creator now runs under https, with working links to Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions. But see update comment below - https://orcid.org/register
Spoke too soon. Some of the registration and account management parts of the site are under https; but some are not. Looks like revisions have not been made to internal links to make it all work properly. Sigh.
- Seb Schmoller
Version 1.0 of "Good practices for university open-access policies" from the Harvard Open Access Project just out. - http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/hoap...
The principal author, Peter Suber's explanation: "In anticipation of worldwide Open Access Week, the Harvard Open Access Project is pleased to release version 1.0 of a guide to good practices for university open-access policies. Gathering together recommendations on drafting, adopting, and implementing OA policies, the guide is based on policies adopted at Harvard, Stanford, MIT, and a couple of dozen other institutions around the world. But it's not limited to policies of this type and includes recommendations that should be useful to institutions taking other approaches. The guide is designed to evolve. As co-authors, we plan to revise and enlarge it over time, building on our own experience and the experience of colleagues elsewhere. We welcome suggestions. The guide deliberately refers to "good practices" rather than "best practices". On many points, there are multiple, divergent good practices. Good practices are easier to identify than best practices. And there can be wider...
more...
- Seb Schmoller
Giving credit. Report from Sebastian Thrun's talk to the Sloan Consortium's 18th annual conference. Excerpt below. - http://www.insidehighered.com/news...
"But in his comments to the Sloan-C crowd, Thrun from the very first took great pains not to aggrandize himself or his fellow MOOCsters. He peppered his comments with statements like "I'm not the first to think about online education" and "as you surely know better than me," and at one point told the assembled that he was "just stepping in your footsteps." (In a nod to those who have complained that much of the recent news coverage has ignored an earlier iteration of massive online courses staged several years ago by Stephen Downes and George Siemens, Thrun himself referred to the "MOOC hype" and acknowledged that various people had beaten him to the idea, even if his and other recent courses are "perhaps a bit more massive."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
Giving credit. Report from Sebastian Thrun's talk to the Sloan Consortium's 18th annual conference. Excerpt below. - http://www.insidehighered.com/news...
"But in his comments to the Sloan-C crowd, Thrun from the very first took great pains not to aggrandize himself or his fellow MOOCsters. He peppered his comments with statements like "I'm not the first to think about online education" and "as you surely know better than me," and at one point told the assembled that he was "just stepping in your footsteps." (In a nod to those who have complained that much of the recent news coverage has ignored an earlier iteration of massive online courses staged several years ago by Stephen Downes and George Siemens, Thrun himself referred to the "MOOC hype" and acknowledged that various people had beaten him to the idea, even if his and other recent courses are "perhaps a bit more massive.""
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
"Mr Friend: True, and the answer to my mind is open access, when everybody could have free access. What I would urge this Committee to consider is the recommendations to government that any articles based on publicly-funded research should be freely accessible over the Internet." "Professor Williams: .... in my journal, and I publish papers all round the world, the vast majority of institutions do not work in this area, they could not, in fact, understand what we publish, and I think one has to be very careful in determining policy on the basis that everybody should have free access to what we publish."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
"No, you're not entitled to your opinion." Terrific piece about rationality by Patrick Stokes via @Stephen_Curry. Excerpt below. - http://theconversation.edu.au/no-your...
"The problem with “I’m entitled to my opinion” is that, all too often, it’s used to shelter beliefs that should have been abandoned. It becomes shorthand for “I can say or think whatever I like” – and by extension, continuing to argue is somehow disrespectful. And this attitude feeds, I suggest, into the false equivalence between experts and non-experts that is an increasingly pernicious feature of our public discourse."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
"I think that Daniel is correct to point to the similarity between the current crop of xMOOCs and the elite universities’ previous unsuccessful forays into the world of online learning (does anyone remember Universitas 21 or California Virtual University?) but given that we (the cMOOC people) were around then and that this is what we built instead, it is all more disappointing that Daniel didn’t attempt more than a cursory look at cMOOCs."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
Our manifesto: “The Right to Read is the Right to Mine”; Universities: you must fight for Open Content Mining before it’s too late - http://blogs.ch.cam.ac.uk/pmr...
Seb - I don't think I've seen PMR leaving a comment on FF before. Probably best to ask the same question on Twitter or better still, on the post itself ;-)
- Graham Steel
Graham - thanks. I will follow your advice. Seb
- Seb Schmoller
Students and their families are being shoved into the machine that is the national testing system and mashed up for the purposes of the national testing system and not for the learners, their families and the schools.
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet
"Even more important will be to improve the quality of the existing 440,000-strong workforce. Sutton Trust research shows that English schools could move into the world’s top five education performers within a decade if the performance of the least effective 10th of teachers were brought up to the average."
- Seb Schmoller
from Bookmarklet