This needed to be said, but that doesn't necessarily mean I agree with all of it. HTML5 is a step over pure tag soup because even though it doesn't have the syntactical clarity of XML by default, it does have a consistent serialization to an internal model, which e.g. can be used as XHTML5. I think the W3C did too much to turn XHTML into an ivory tower exercise, and this was all inevitable.
- Uche Ogbuji
from Bookmarklet
"I am starting to see how data portability is one of the great problems this technology can solve." - good overview from a relationship db knowledgeable attendee...
- mike "glemak" dunn
from Bookmarklet
Algorithms of the Intelligent Web is an example-driven blueprint for creating applications that collect, analyze, and act on the massive quantities of data users leave in their wake as they use the web. Readers learn to build Netflix-style recommendation engines, and how to apply the same techniques to social-networking sites. See how click-trace analysis can result in smarter ad rotations. All the examples are designed both to be reused and to illustrate a general technique- an algorithm-that applies to a broad range of scenarios. As they work through the book's many examples, readers learn about recommendation systems, search and ranking, automatic grouping of similar objects, classification of objects, forecasting models, and autonomous agents. They also become familiar with a large number of open-source libraries and SDKs, and freely available APIs from the hottest sites on the internet, such as Facebook, Google, eBay, and Yahoo.
- New Tech Books
"This is a web service for converting semantic web data from one format to another. RDF/XML, Turtle and RDF/JSON can all be converted into one another, converted to TriX, Exhibit/JSON, or RSS 1.0, or rendered as HTML. SPARQL Results XML, and Facets XML, can be rendered as HTML, or converted to JSON."
- Mike Chelen
from Bookmarklet
had dinner w/ richard last night - good to finally meet him in person - this post is a good overview of tom tague's keynote, almost a call-to-action for those interested in semtech...
- mike "glemak" dunn
from Bookmarklet
I've been trying to generate some Java OO classes from a RDF schema/OWL but I've realized that those specs are missing some constraints ( e.g. literal property or URI matching a regex ) or are difficult to use (e.g. how can I say that a class is 'abstract' , no instance of it should be created ). I'm I wrong ? Should I create my personal 'schema' ?
"So what do the VCs want to see in the business plans for semantic start-ups now? Are there still plenty of good opportunities out there for entrepreneurs or have the best ideas already claimed their share of available capital?"
- mike "glemak" dunn
from Bookmarklet
Semantic technology will be the enabler for new business models. when you say semantic startups looks like their business model is the technology itself. we don't call any of the current startups as "relational database" startups, do we? When semantic tech moves beyond that point is when things will be really interesting.
- Alberto Escarlate
agreed alberto - that actually is one of the points i hope to make on this panel, right now semtech is overly complex due to its lexicon & the high percentage of folks from theoretical and research focused agendas (not a bad thing and where most nascent capabilities start) but it create barriers in understand and adoption which of course correlates to challenges when seeking funding sources - also, i know you're just making a point but semtech is very different than relational db :-p
- mike "glemak" dunn
They interviewed me, and also scattered quotes by me throughout the issue. They also mentioned my company, Zepheira quite a few times. Nice. Tomorrow I lead a webcast for some key PWC customers.
- Uche Ogbuji
from Bookmarklet
More on Posterous tomorrow, when I'm less tired
- Uche Ogbuji
"The biggest block to the Semantic Web is not the lack of a killer app, it's the rejection of incremental steps, "no that's not what we meant" etc. The web will get more semantic, but the Semantic Web will never be allowed to happen." -- Michal Migurski, http://radar.oreilly.com/2009...
This is a clear statement of what I've believed for almost 5 years now. Back around '02 and '03 I was pretty frustrated that the Sem Web community seemed more interested a Semantic Web of planet Vulcan than of planet Earth. Humans are not creatures of cold logic. We're creatures of warm, messy self-expression, and unless Sem Webbers learn to take our best guess from the tiny cues in large amounts of experience with that messy self-expression (which is what humans actually do in life, BTW), they'll never be satisfied with what they have, which is growing richer every day. I've always believed that Google is the Sem Web's best friend. I've always believed that the push for XML is Sem Web's best friend. I've always believed that "Web 2.0" is Sem Web's best friend. I hope more Sem Webbers come to appreciate that, otherwise they might be lost in misery regardless of all their success.
- Uche Ogbuji
I'm not sure which articles you are reading but I've never heard anything but fascination about how the Semantic Web is improving. There's relative degrees of academia and layman orientations but the whole thing is extremely exciting where-ever you go, what-ever technology you're focusing on. The idea that the Semantic Web is somehow not compatible with all this other "stuff" out there...
more...
- Scott L Holmes
Hi Scott. This is not based on articles I've read. I'm one of the Sem Web pioneers and I wrote my first article advocating Sem Web in 2000 [1]. I'm co-founder of a Sem Web firm [2]. I've been writing software for Sem Web almost constantly since 2000. I've worked in and with the Sem Web community. Things are looking better now, but we could easily have been at this point in 2003 or 2004...
more...
- Uche Ogbuji
Ah. Got it. I remember several years ago hearing complaints about the whole web 2.0 thing and visversa. The beauty part of linked data/rdf/owl is that it solves some serious and fundamental issues with relating entities. The beauty part of Ajax is that you can have smart clients and smart servers talking to each other, erm smartly. Complaining that Web 2.0 didn't "get it" and visversa...
more...
- Scott L Holmes
Right. Linked data is Sem Web done *right*. I have an article about that, too :) . "Much better to stick to real things that have urls that resolve to actual documents". Amen! That's what I've been preaching since 2000. Who cares if it's in XML or microformats? We're smart enough to work the data the way we like. Scott, If you happen to be atSTC09, please look out for me and say "hi". [1] http://www.ibm.com/develop...
- Uche Ogbuji
I know it's a partial list, but I'm surprised they omitted Zepheira, considering we're a sponsor of the conference.
- Uche Ogbuji
Ah, I was just told that the list was based on registrations, and we're a bunch of slow-pokes so no one from Zepheira has registered yet :) I should have known it was something like that.
- Uche Ogbuji
The idea that we will soon be able to take data from all over web and pull it into a form that’s useful to us is highly seductive. However, there’s a dark side to semantic search that leads me to hesitate in welcoming our new Web 3.0 overlords. While this new era will allow you to easily generate data about anything you care to research, someone else could just as easily be researching you.
- Martin Bryant
from Bookmarklet
I suppose this is the natural corollary to us posting personal photos all over the place.
- Silner
from twhirl
I've actually been pretty paranoid about this myself. None of my public (read: completely viewable by anyone) accounts say where I actually am, mention my name or any of those of my friends or the places I go to. Not that it's impossible to discover those, but I'd rather not make it super easy for anyone to do so. But that's just me, not advocating anyone else do the same.
- LANjackal
i have assignment [and Dublin Core is must) from agriculture institute's web site/database to adapt existing application profiles (on bibliographic data, events, news projects) to a new subject area. The documents all exist for the agriculture Subject area and would need to be adapted to the Area of Science and Technology. And this should be applied within another project at another portal- apart from this one. I never had expereince with Dublin core before. Is it user friendly, not requires programming?
- Danica Radovanovic
i';m reading lot of documents form web, http://dublincore.org/documen... and others, but as non programmer - do you think i can adopt this? it's hard to describe here in few words what i need to do, as i'm limited in space.
- Danica Radovanovic
Danica, I'm not sure I understand what you really need. As far as I know DC, it is a standard set of identifiers to describe a document (its author, subject, date,etc...). You can use DC without being a programmer. A common way to use DC is a RDF description. See this post in the life-scientists room to see how RDF was used http://tinyurl.com/ckqxgahttp://tinyurl.com/6ytbyd
- Pierre
Faviki is periodically synchronized with Wikipedia and now contains a little less than a million new tags - around 300.000 new English tags and 669.600 new tags in other languages! That means that currently there are 5.6 million tags in Faviki - 2.7 million English and 2.9 million tags from other 13 languages. - http://faviki.wordpress.com/2008...
“Twitter Linked Open Data SPARQL challenge: list of countries with English & local names (not latinized ones= 中国 not Zhongguo).” - http://friendfeed.com/e...