Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »
I've got 10 invites to @threadsy at https://www.threadsy.com/index2... It pulls your mail/twitter/facebook into a unified inbox then throws IM in the mix.
I'm itching with anticipation for the ANCYL's press release on the SACP's rebuff of Malema. I can see the slurs & wild allegations already.
@warpeddragon It's certainly not a bad idea.
@Craigrodney Open up a terminal and type "drutil eject"
@Craigrodney Yeah, there a many ways to eject the OSX CD tray (google it). I think the lack of eject button is a usability failure.
@threadsy Please sort out speed of update on the inbound stream. My twitter inbound was last updated Nov 5th and manual update does nothing.
@Craigrodney I mean a hardware eject button.
@GoldFishLive Happy birthday, Dom, but only because you have the coolest name in the world ever. Also, your music's sort of alright.
@andyhadfield The command line is a magic wand. You can be a beneficent mage or a destructive fool :)
Threadsy (@threadsy) just addeed Meebo, web based IM, integration. Very cool.
@thamsanqa Ha ha, don't blame your late night on me. Wine-infused-late-night-techno-zealot-arguments ftw.
@antonycarthy Except people use the Internet to talk to their wife, explore their fantasies and disagree with the government.
@antonycarthy No, Schneier makes an a priori argument for privacy as necessary for liberty, dignity & intimacy. Malls don't change that.
Frustrated with the short term memory of search.twitter? Use "site:twitter.com/<username> <search term>" on Google for a longer view.
@antonycarthy You're welcome to assert that, but it remains just that, an assertion.
Iron really is much snappier than Firefox, but it's missing the adblock functionality, proper cookie control and NoScript. #dealbreaker
@antonycarthy No one said "everything must be private." You're saying "everything on the Internet must be public." I disagree, strongly.
@_____C No, a Google that let's you opt out completely (disclose & delete all your data in return for no service) is an example trade off.
@_____C Two reasons 1) As a PR move (ala their privacy dashboard) 2) To limit legal liability for "unconsented" data collection.
@antonycarthy See http://twitter.com/singe... for Ian Currie's paper on the matter.
@_____C Not sure I get you. Are you saying Schneier's wrong but only because he doesn't worry enough about privacy under corporate control?
@_____C That requires much work & doesn't allow you to "recover from" prior use. Either way, it's an example that disproves your dichotomy.
Trying out SRWare's Iron for Linux http://www.srware.net/en... It's Chrome, but with the privacy invasion removed http://www.srware.net/en...
It's nice to see Google CEO, Schmidt, put his cards on the table about privacy. He's wrong. Schneier says why http://www.schneier.com/blog...
It's nice to see Google founder Schmidt put his cards on the table about privacy. He's wrong. Schneier says why http://www.schneier.com/blog...
Hours of research, and several claims of shenanigans http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009... all wasted with a simple explanation http://www.bom.gov.au/climate... #ClimateGate
@_____C Risk-based analysis deals with potential of event occurence. "Until is happens to you" means "the potential of it happening is high"
@_____C As for the justification of it being high, I think the claim that a belief it's 0, leads people into higher risk behaviour is valid.
Unpacking the "Nothing to hide, nothing to fear" fallacy http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/site...
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook