skopp › Comments

"Or maybe they thought it was not actual rhetoric, but was a new form of spam/scam which if entertained (uses reverse psychology to get you to repond despite stating it's unneccessary to) will have you eventually end up purchasing bath salts via Paypal." - skopp

"Your username should be **Meta**to. You single-handedly dismantled **all the things!** Amazing." - skopp

"OMG what have I caused?" - skopp

"Bah... didn't even realize I was being downmoated *yikes*. I'm used to it anyway. I have this habit: I just **must**ache the weird questions. That's why I've found a new home at [Quora!](http://quora.com) - where you get to ask *Anything, as long as it's not about Jimmy Wales^TM* Two things:" - skopp

"I heard a quote once somewhere, can't remember exactly. Was to the effect: "History will stand judgment". Could be centuries later even, but the truth usually finds a way out. Not implying anything about Hitler per se here, but I do believe that there are always two (at minimum) sides to every story. Does a man labeled as evil truly see himself as evil? I don't know, it's a rhetorical question." - skopp

"I'm serious. Even if one person would read it, I'll write it." - skopp

"You should apologize for call those whales "fat"." - skopp

"I'm sorry for you guys being aso sorry and stuff... but this is bespoke. Indeed, time consuming, mentally exhausting and it doesn't end even once the app is made." - skopp

"Are you serious? I **love** this idea (mind the pun). I can so write this... with a dark twist too. I won't say what." - skopp

"Like watching the telephone at your office desk. I agree... Facebook is stupid," - skopp

"It is. DRY = Don't Repeat Yourself. I didn't realize, until your message, that the first part of my comment was three metaphorical processes (doing things). What do you call a pun combined with an unwitting joke?" - skopp

"DMCA takedown? RIAA: now infiltrating... CSS?" - skopp

"Great man! P.s: I hadn't come on Reddit for... what, 3 or 4 months - and it turns out to be my "Reddit birthday" - I'm Five! :D I seeked out a happy thread from the list and spotted this one; kill two birds kinda thing. Till next time (next year?) - peace, ninjas." - skopp

"What? But... and...? How?! I'm sorry, but that's a rather dry way of doing things." - skopp

"Thanks for replying anyway. :/" - skopp

"I think DIGG is the asshole" - skopp

"*sending thread to trashcan*" - skopp

"Thank you, if it means anything, for a nice, calm (in tone), succint answer. The only one at that, too." - skopp

"Of course it matters that askers get such answers. Lest it be a waste of time. My what was not what?? You lost me. Complaining? Sorry, I was attempting to ask, to understand; not to complain. From there, I don't know what you said.... until the fuck off bit. I told myself to fuck off. Are you serious? XD I don't know who the asshole is, but **REDDIT IS THE DICK**" - skopp

""Oh no, people didn't respect your poorly worded and not particularly helpful answer!" = assumption? "You're going to need to grow some thicker skin," = ... assumption? " because if -1 karma bothers you, you're going to be fucked when you encounter people in the real world." - this I'll grant you, is good advice. Shall I go on? 1. "Poorly worded comments like this" - define the criteria for poorly worded anything, please 2. "You assume I'm a flamer." - Wrong. I deduced so from your response: "Oh no, people didn't respect your poorly worded and not particularly helpful answer!". You may be right though. Troll is more suited. 3. "There would be no point in flaming a small time thread like this." 3a) "no point in flaming [anything]" - correct 3b) "..flaming **this small time thread**" - aha? Necessary much? 3c) "This was feedback." -like vomit, right? Feedback. 3d) "The internet has gotten you riled up" - how about I use your tactic here. Oh no I'm so riled up by the internet!..." - skopp

"I know. I touched on that - the valuable coding subreddits. NOT the karma - my post remains unedited and is clear on that. But that's not what Sniping Robot said (more to....). You answered _for_ him. Why?" - skopp

"You are following the classic "pinpoint the target, aim, FLAME"; you're making my one example (which I included as... uh, an example) the actual *topic*. My rant was not about that post. It was about *you*. THis type of feedback. Put yourself in the reader of your comment's place, and think... do you expect a response? If so, what type - hostile? If that's the case, can you call it a meaningful/helpful/objective/productive discussion? Oh, that's rhetorical - google it. Hint: You don't have to answer it." - skopp

"Exactly. And also ironic - why are you and I here?" - skopp

"It's good to let it out. Create a pen name, start a fresh [Dropbox](http://db.tt/fg1jTKk) account (*note: that is a referral link which will grant both of us 500MB bonus space, FYI / just so you're aware*), sign up with [Scriptogram](http://goo.gl/x8T34] and start writing to your great great great children. When you die, there will be a story from the horse's mouth. This is just one suggestion, by the way (my exact method I mean - I mention/link the above because they are more open-source than Blogger and Wordpress. Oh and Reddit! Where's the export to XML feature?) but what I',m saying is: let it out. Pen and paper is cool too, sometimes better than online. And on that note... just be very careful of what you post online. Maybe a bit off-topic, but I've seen some people I know IRL post pictures of themselves snorting coke and stupid things like that on Facebook." - skopp

"Somebody buy this man a month of Reddit Gold, pronto. If I had money I would." - skopp

"True. Technically, a *company* or *enterprise*, or even *organization* - in Commercial Law, is recognized as a "person". That is, an entity. I tend to draw a direct analogy in my head to thinking of it as an actual person - a human being, or a sentient being. Maybe a better way to put it is by saying it's a 'body' responsible for generating income via provision of products and/or services. Implicitly, said 'body' automatically takes on the responsibilities that written laws and usually common work ethic impose" - skopp

"in some countries or juris-my-dictions, this is akin to **Trading As**, correct?" - skopp

"Yes, I do. SKUDA. But I'm in the process of binding it to a close corporation for future-proofing. You asked about legals - if/when you start to see the kaching-kaching, the govt notices, and wants a piece of your bling-bling. Tax ensues... which is the same as using your money as toilet paper IMO, but as a wise man once said is one of just two things that are guaranteed in life (the other being *death*)" - skopp

Posted via email from skuda_submerged - skopp from Posterous

Posted via email from skuda_submerged - skopp from Posterous