Hey Cameron, some of us author papers collaboratively on Google Docs!
- AJCann
But they're just showing versioned instant messaging, right now. cool, but I would like to see more. :)
- Allyson Lister
a Guardian robot was shown for searching the Guardian.
- Allyson Lister
Can someone add me to the wave? username nuin
- pn
And very nice: a Watexy robot for displaying latex figures
- Allyson Lister
Sort of jealous - wish I could "wave" (is it a verb yet?) :)
- Allyson Lister
Can someone as the cat herders what they think of Daniel MacArthur's tweet: "Google Wave "will make flame wars almost immediate..."?
- Bob O'Hara
Seems to me that robots are the truly innovative aspect of wave from a users point of view (but beyond the authoring capabilities of mere mortals).
- AJCann
Waves can store structured information in a transparent way.
- Martin Fenner
Ian M suggests wave robots can tame APIs for mere mortals.
- AJCann
Is wave a technology in search of a problem? Like all new tech, will need a "killer app" to take off. What is the killer app for wave?
- AJCann
Hashtag consensus seems to be that wave is underwhelming...
- AJCann
Cameron talks about using a Wave as a tool to design a laboratory workflow, where the Wave can be used with different datasets.
- Martin Fenner
I think we just need to see more exciting apps, and not sure there's been enough time or people in the early testing to get that (yet), @AJCann. I remain hopeful...
- Allyson Lister
Live collaboration might not be needed for writing a paper. It's just a byproduct of the version control mechanism.
- Martin Fenner
Can someone ask how tech savvy one has to be to use Wave?
- Bob O'Hara
Bob: not very tech savvy. The interface is just still a little bit klunky.
- Martin Fenner
A few people there are twittering and worrying about what they need to know.
- Bob O'Hara
Ian Mulvany: if you submit a manuscript written as a Wave, you can track exactly who did what.
- Martin Fenner
IMHO, it would be great for small collaboration efforts
- pn
Bob: No one answered on the Wave, I don't know if it's over there
- pn
Wave is different from FriendFeed, because it is conversations between a specific group of people.
- Martin Fenner
In a way, but there are ways to find public conversations, and embedded waves on blogs/sites can open the discussion.
- pn
It decentralizes the discussion, centralizing its repository.
- pn
Why Cameron likes Wave: it solves many little problems that have bothered us for a long time.
- Martin Fenner
Chris Thorpe: Google Wave is pushing data, so much smarter than pulling data in services such as Twitter.
- Martin Fenner
If any presenter is listening, can you please play the video of the demo for the SL folks? they're asking nicely...
- Allyson Lister
Disadvantage of Google Wave: it can't be used offline. Future versions will probably be able to do that (using Google Gears).
- Martin Fenner
So I wonder if wave is the reason Apple are building those huge data centers...
- AJCann
Paulo, can you add "If any presenter is listening, can you please play the video of the demo for the SL folks? they're asking nicely..." to the wave?
- Daniel Mietchen
Thanks Bjoern - it came slightly too late.
- Daniel Mietchen
Sorry - am reviewing a paper in parallel :-)
- Björn Brembs
@bob: lol, I wish :-) But I could keep a wave open with questions to colleagues (or the authors if it was an open review). Beats email and chat and phone, in my eyes.
- Björn Brembs
Waves could be used in the review process. It would also work for anonymous peer review, because parts of a Wave can be private discussions.
- Martin Fenner
My guess it's neither (haven't used it), but a key aspect of our evolution to an event-driven web
- Deepak Singh
I am WAY EXCITED about Google Wave!!!!!!! I want to play with it right now actually.
- Arikia
I really liked this demo/session - thanks, panel.
- Maxine
Thanks Maxine. I was afraid the session was to "geeky" for many in the audience.
- Martin Fenner
Looking back I'm thinking that we may have fallen between the stools of trying to cater for both the excited geeks and those who had no idea what we were talking about. That and we clearly needed some flashier robots to get the wow factor up :-)
- Cameron Neylon
Well I thought the robots were appropriate to the meeting's agenda. Really, it was a good session. I think you did have some exceptionally knowledgeable geek outliers in your audience (in reality and virtually). I certainly learned a lot from it and I am somewhere in the middle of your two extremes, Cameron ;-)
- Maxine