Got a sec? If you can read and understand a scientific abstract then we need you to help make the publishing world more science 2.0 friendly. Thirty seconds, five minutes, half an hour - whatever you can spare would be great. - http://blogs.nature.com/wp...
Thank guys! It's a bit of a slog but is really useful info.
- Euan
I did 10 or 12. In some places there are repeated comments.
- pn
Did a couple -- found one where an author had reported on a journal club dissection of her paper. I called it a "comment from author" since that's who submitted it, but it's also a journal club. Any chance we could pick more than one option at a time?
- Bill Hooker
Liked so I will remember to do this when I have a moment
- Shirley Wu
+1 "Any chance we could pick more than one option at a time?" Agreed, Bill.
- Graham Steel
This looks interesting... Will do some more tomorrow when I have some more time.
- Ricardo Vidal
I gave a couple of minutes to it this afternoon. Maybe more tomorrow.
- Jill O'Neill
Going through a couple now. Recognizing some names. Multiple categories would be better, if it's doable within your analysis. Also there might need to be a category for "discussion among commenters".
- Mr. Gunn
bumping this up for visibility - please help Euan out on this.
- Bora Zivkovic
Bookmarked , will have a look during this week.
- Pedro Beltrao
How should we mark comments from authors replying to direct criticism ? are these just comments from authors as well?
- Pedro Beltrao
@Pedro yeah, any type of author response is a comment from author rather than anything else.
- Euan
I would update the app to allow multiple categories - I think on balance it's a better idea - but I'd have to dump all of the work done so far, so it's a no go. :( I'll try and put up better guidance and a 'annotators discuss' box.
- Euan
Incidentally there are now ~ 700 annotations, which is fantastic, thanks everybody! About a third of the way there.
- Euan
Great crowdsourcing idea. Some commenters were familiar (Bora Zivkovic, Graham Steel, Björn Brehms).
- Martin Fenner
I submitted this to the science subreddit (http://www.reddit.com/r...) and it generated quite some interest and comments there. Two I liked were to submit this as a HIT to Mechanical Turk, and a seperate category for people pointing out typos.
- Jeroen Van Goey
I think I've seen the same comments come up twice. Are you oversampling and taking the consensus ranking?
- Mr. Gunn
I've also seen some cases where the author posted the reviewers anonymous comments as a comment. I think that's a useful practice.
- Mr. Gunn
Good idea - I've done a couple, will do more as time permits. I, too, saw familiar "faces" (I'm looking at you, Deepak!)
- Allyson Lister
I've seen a case where a person seemed to be trying to put a trackback in the comment field (they blogged about the article). Could only put it into "other"...
- Allyson Lister
OK I've pitched in and done a few too :)
- Daniel Swan
Thanks guys! Almost got complete coverage now (waiting for there to be more than one decision on some comments).
- Euan
@ Euan, is it possible for someone to only do abstracts in a particular topic area (e.g. Comp bio)? A colleague is asking. Might not matter at this point since it sounds like you're almost there
- Shirley Wu
@Shirley sadly not as the articles aren't categorized inside PLoS ONE (I don't think).
- Euan
Maybe it would be possible to come up with some silly geeky games for scientists that would help publishers tag abstracts or images. "name that cell type" :). Using the same strategies of Luis von Ahn's games.
- Pedro Beltrao
Google does that sort of labeling game on their images. Not a game per se, but basically tagging images. Crowdsourcing.
- Ricardo Vidal
@Ricardo I think the Google Image labeling was inspired on those crowdsourcing games from Luis von Ahn. The problem with Mechanical Turk is that lack of scientific background of the users. I am not sure that even just this task of sorting comments according to the rules Euan set up would work over there.
- Pedro Beltrao