damienpbuckley: Just a thought for all those bitching about vendor prefixes - would you rather we went back to the IE6 decade when you could do fuck all? - http://twitter.com/damienp...
abosio: Is there a easy place for devs to find a maintained list of CSS WG "standardized or 'stable'" unprefixed properties? @t @meyerweb - http://twitter.com/abosio...
Haraldson: @cssquirrel Yep. And for how effing long? I use different vendor prefixes myself, but I'm getting tired of it. Time to get the stds. done. - http://twitter.com/Haralds...
Haraldson: @cssquirrel I think the difference is important. If you have the standard prop after, who cares what vendor prefixes you use? - http://twitter.com/Haralds...
cssquirrel: @Haraldson It means enough devs are using only -webkit (without other vendor prefixes and/or non-prefixed follow-ups) to cause a problem. - http://twitter.com/cssquir...
spaceninja: After reading @t's interview about a webkit monoculture on mobile, I'm pleased to see that we built the cityeats.com mobile site properly. - http://twitter.com/spaceni...
librarychik: RT @spaceninja: If you write CSS, @meyerweb's interview with @t about mozilla adding -webkit prefixes is required reading.... - http://twitter.com/library...
joshbroton: I checked our analytics (100+ sites), and only 1 visitor was using @Mozilla @firefox Mobile. Not worth breaking the web over. cc @t - http://twitter.com/joshbro...