Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »
Management, open access and changes at LLN - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
How do you define “big”? - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Cites & Insights volume 9 indexes available - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Mystery Collection Disc 4 - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Cites & Insights 9:13 (December 2009) now available - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
I'd never seen that Miedema blog post. About to bookmark it; it is teh awesome. - D0r0th34
I'd entirely forgotten it, frankly--the virtues of printing & saving leadsheets. - Walt Crawford
also, is this the place where I say that I'm pretty meh about Google Wave, and if I were to make a bet, I'd bet on it going the way of Orkut? - D0r0th34
As good a place as any. So far, I haven't even marked any Google Wave stuff in Delicious for possible discussion in C&I (but that may be me). - Walt Crawford
also re: Bivens-Tatum (have you got a link to that? I can't remember what the heck I said) -- if we can't fulfill our mission because the purchasing game is totally rigged against us, are we really failures? or are we only failures if we fail to try to change the game? (y'all know my completely biased answer, of course ;) ) - D0r0th34
and homg how did I not know about Collections 2.0? Subscribed! - D0r0th34
Apropos nothing in particular (other than made-up facts): Some blocks are easier than others. Sometimes, one statement is all it takes...fortunately, not from a library person.
Funding and Marketing at the Library Leadership Network - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Halloween pizza: Pretty scary - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Friday lesson from too many directions: Sometimes you just need to step away from the read/write web. Maybe for an hour or two. Maybe for a day. Maybe for a weekend. Maybe forever. Otherwise, you'll forget to click Cancel after writing what you'd really like to say, and... And with that, it's time to go read. A book. In paper form.
Always a good plan. - laura x
Man, if everybody did that I'd actually have to get some work done. - Steve is older than ever
Sometimes it’s just a waste - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Alright! A LITA-L post with 13, count 'em, 13 "Re:"s (one of them a RE:) before the actual subject, "Google Wave Invite." Probably not a record... four more, and Gmail will hide the actual subject entirely!
Ah, and one of the people has already made a comment about Aretha Franklin... - Walt Crawford
A tiny little LITA-related post - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Sony’s Ereader should be the Cell - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Know-how, generations, ebook readers and more at LLN - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Library Access to Scholarship: More thoughts - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
A public thanks to Iris J., awesome as usual, for pointing out the easy way to identify threads in FF that began in private feeds--I never noticed the little lock. (And, fortunately, the lock survives the Stylish styles I use to clean up FF.) Makes it easier to respect privacy without completely ruling out use of some FF items.
Here's an honest question, one also asked in a Walt at Random post right about now: Do you think it’s inappropriate or undesirable for your FriendFeed comments to be used in secondary discussions (e.g., in Cites & Insights) in the same way your blog posts and comments might be?
I assume that someone could use them. Having said that, I come from a field that takes the ethics of using other people's writing seriously. I would go through IRB if I were doing an academic study of those comments, but if I were using them as a reference, I wouldn't. There is a good chance I'd let the person know I'm using comment(s). - Katy S
Katy: I guess I'm really asking "Would you prefer..." rather than whether it's ethical or legal. - Walt Crawford
I assume that they could be used - but I would also like to be aware the the comment might be used (particularly if attribution is going to be given) with the option to request that it not be - but even then knowing that I can say no, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't be used anyway. - ÉllbeeÇee
I'd like to know, but I also know that I can't control whether someone uses it or not so I don't fret about it. Sure, I prefer it, but I don't necessarily expect it. - Katy S
Some people have to approve your following them, and I find it less appropriate to use comments from those individuals elsewhere without explicit permission. - Rachel Walden
I think I would just really like notification that you had used them. I could then create my own ff post or blog detailing how I felt about you using them ;) - JSNFLMNG
Like Rachel says, people with locked accounts have an expectation of privacy and you should probably ask. People with open accounts (like me) should expect their contributions to be as public as a blog or Twitter. That being said, people here do seem less guarded than those other platforms so you might want to ask before quoting something particularly outrageous. - John Dupuis
I have used group FriendFeed posts and group tweets for the groups I'm admin for on a poster without asking, I see it the same as web archives for a listserv. I'd hesitate drilling down to the personal FriendFeed account level though. - Nikki D.
I operate under the concept that if I comment on something you've posted, you are entitled to use my comments in future discussions if you choose. However, I wouldn't mind at least being notified that you are going to do so. - Jill is sugar free
I feel like the context matters, and quoting the comments elsewhere strips away that context and so it's good to ask permission. I recently asked someone if it was okay to quote her blog comment in a more formal newsletter piece. I probably wouldn't quote something someone says in an unguarded moment at the bar while presenting them with a professional award, either, even though the first took place at least semi-publicly. - Rachel Walden
I'm sorry. Maybe I'm being insensitive or clueless here, but I'm not sure I get why someone would expect notification before a comment they made in a public space is quoted or discussed elsewhere. If I publish a book or an article, do I expect that someone asks permission before they quote a piece of what I said? Is it a matter of proportion? If someone quotes a paragraph from my... more... - Stephen Francoeur
As above, ask first for private feeds but public feeds are public property. The usual courtesies apply -- ask before quoting someone saying "Powerful Person X is a douchebag", etc -- but, as always, one should probably rely more upon discretion than upon those courtesies for protection from oneself... - Bill Hooker
Stephen, I don't necessarily expect it, but I think asking is a polite and reasonable thing to do. (and I agree with what Bill says above) - Rachel Walden
(I say that as one whose public comments have, on more than one occasion, come back to bite me on the ass.) - Bill Hooker
I'd agree that it is polite, but part of me wonders what happens if the person says no. Where does fair use fit in to this discussion. Or does it (seriously, I don't know if it does). - Stephen Francoeur
I suppose Bill's points about discretion being part of the equation make some sense. If someone said something outrageous or provocative, I can see some reason why you might want to contact the author of those comments...maybe. (*mulling it all over in my head now*) - Stephen Francoeur
Were Michael Gorman to post a snarky comment here in FriendFeed, and I want to mention it in a blog post or a tweet or a new FriendFeed thread, should I contact him first? - Stephen Francoeur
I'm with Bill on this one. If it's a public discussion, it's pretty much up for grabs. - Mary Beth Sancomb Moran
I'm disappearing to work on But Still They Blog, but will check back later, and so far find this VERY interesting...particularly since, frankly, for Cites & Insights "ask before you quote"/"notify if you use" would have the effect of shutting down the publication; the rewards, particularly in 2010, wouldn't justify all the extra effort. So, well, I'll keep seeing what folks have to say. (I'd like to think I do use *some* discretion, except when someone's gone to exceptional efforts to be a jerk.) - Walt Crawford
It's a public forum, expect to be quoted, don't expect to be notified. - Jeff Scott
It is difficult to remember who has a public feed versus a private feeds. For example, you probably subscribe to Dorothea, and she has a private feed (I think). If you can see her comments and quote her, or point to her discussion thread, it may be difficult for other people to see her comment, since the whole world won't be able to see the context. - Joe....
yes, I do have a private feed, because I've already gotten myself in work trouble over social media and am not interested in having that happen again. - D0r0th34
Hmm. But there's a difference between Dorothea's actual posts (which are private) and her comments on other posts (which, I would assume, are as public as those people's feeds are, right?) [In other words: did those of you who don't subscribe to Dorothea see her comment immediately preceding this one?] - Walt Crawford
Yes, Walt, there is that difference, and I try to remain aware of it. - D0r0th34
I think you do. I think it's up to me (and others who may use material) to pay more attention. Actually, given the tenor of the discussion so far, I'm inclined to think I *should* normally treat FF discussions as ephemera, not using them in C&I unless they've been explicitly included in blog discussions. Which was really the guidance I was looking for. "Normally" is a key word here. - Walt Crawford
Hmm. For curiosity-satisfying purposes, I just blocked a couple of people who said "public feed, up for grabs," and I no longer see their comments in this thread, so not sure about how that works, exactly. Walt, yours is public, isn't it? - Rachel Walden
Yes, my feed is public. - Walt Crawford
Blocking, which I've only done once or twice, is the nukular option: You don't see ANYTHING from that person. (Yes, I know how to spell nuclear. Even how to pronounce it.) - Walt Crawford
Ah, okay. Thought maybe I would still see them in discussion, just not their own posts. - Rachel Walden
Hm. I'd like the comment linked to the broader discussion so nothing's taken too far out of context, but I figure if I put it on the 'net, folks will use it as they want (though I do like to be notified). - The Archangel ωαřмaiden
Good point from TAw -- linking should be de rigueur when quoting from an online source: it provides original context for the quote and credibility for the person doing the quoting. I might *appreciate* notification after or a request before being quoted from a public comment, but I certainly don't *expect* it. The only objection I might have is to being taken out of context, which linking to the source would render moot. - Bill Hooker
I think the tricky part is getting the attribution correct, since some people like to use aliases that fit their current mood. I do think that text here is like microblogging, and tweets do get quoted around without explicit permission. - Jill Hurst-Wahl
For myself, anything I post <strike>publicly</strike> <strike>publically</strike> in public is done with the awareness that it might be quoted, spread far and wide, and/or get tattle-taled to a manager. If I don't want it spreading then I don't say it. --Linking is preferred to provide context. For attribution, I'd go with the username or, if I had time to investigate, look for a preferred name on something more formal like a blog. - Deborah Fitchett
Great stuff. What I'm most likely to do in the future--recognizing that C&I is pretty much unique in the library pantheon of formal, informal & semi-formal pubs--is to feel free to discuss the nature, tenor and opinions within a FF thread, if it's relevant to something else I'm discussing (e.g., comments on a blog post where the post also generated an FF thread), but--generally--not direct quotations. - Walt Crawford
Two notes: C&I is not online; it's "print over the web"--and "not direct quotations" also means "not attributing stuff to names individuals." With some exceptions, to be sure. Anyway, this has been *very* helpful. - Walt Crawford
I just saw email with a Call for Presenters--for a Midwinter discussion group. Seems to me this pushes against the spirit of "no programs at Midwinter" pretty hard...yes, there are and should be focused discussions, but should there really be preplanned programs to this extent?
Well, I've never been to Midwinter, but yes, calling for presenters seems pretty antithetical to "no presentations" to me. It does make me wonder in what ways Midwinter differs from an unconference (plenty, I'm sure--but are there advantages to something set up the way Midwinter is? Which I admittedly know almost nothing about?) - laura x
*shrug* been happening for a while, says someone who was on a panel discussion at last year's MW that didn't have thing one to do with organization business. - D0r0th34
Midwinter is called the Midwinter Meeting (not conference) because the primary function, other than exhibits, is the thousands of business meetings: Only the President gets to have a "Program" identified as such. Theoretically, that means that librarians interested in self-education only need to come to Annual. I think the latter's still true, but there's no doubt that pseudo-programs have grown in Midwinter... - Walt Crawford
Still, they're pseudo: The Midwinter program does not identify programs and speakers except for the President's (and now a few ALA-sponsored things). I've appreciated the old practice of having actual *discussions* at Midwinter discussion & interest groups; I'm always a little sad when they're replaced by panels. But such is life. - Walt Crawford
FriendFeed, trainwrecks and accelerated discussions - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
(The Walt at Random post is 1,798 words that could probably edit down to a tight 450-word post--but I'm too lazy to make it shorter. Sorry.)
50 Movie Comedy Classics Disc 12 - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Survivor’s bias, the case against innovation and more at LLN - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Arrgh. Parade article (I know, but 8 million people read it) starts with a good "being afraid of the right things" section--but turns out to be "why you don't need to worry about global warming, 'cause THE SCIENTISTS WILL FIX IT!" So, you know, go ahead and buy that new 8MPG SUV, 'cause THE SCIENTISTS WILL FIX IT. Aargh.
aargh (but i don't expect much more from Parade) but also a bit of surprise - so everyone trusts scientists to fix it... that's a positive view towards science even if the rest is misguided - Christina Pikas
It's actually a book excerpt, from Superfreakonomics, a book I expect to avoid. And given that the big example is urban horseshit at the turn of the century, which was "solved" by cars, the authors are really saying "Oh, there's always a solution, we just don't know what it is yet." Which, at some point, is an ostrich approach. - Walt Crawford
How often do they post? A followup - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
But still they blog: Pausing for breath - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Chalk notes, library conferences and more at LLN - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Fun with statistics 2: The slightly-less-mythical median liblog - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
On the way from the dump - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
A comment FYI, I really appreciated the LAtS issue. Although I was familiar with a lot of the material before, it was really nice to see it gathered up all in one place and commented on coherently and from a big picture view. I'll probably blog about it when I get a chance, maybe after the long weekend. - John Dupuis
I, too, plan to mention the LAtS issue... if, you know, I ever blog anything again. What John said, plus, I really appreciated the kind comments on, and accurate summaries of, my efforts to bring data to bear on the questions. - Bill Hooker
Thanks. I'll admit, this issue felt a lot better to me when I was reading it through for a final edit than it did as I was putting it together. Maybe my subconscious was putting together a big picture that I didn't consciously see. - Walt Crawford
I often don't know what I think until I read what I wrote. - Bill Hooker
Bill: You've just made my Friday. - Walt Crawford
Sometimes you can't avoid the picky: When someone self-identifies as a freelance writer, I expect them not to use "something happened to someone else and I" construction--maybe that's OK for a blogger, but someone who expects to be paid as a writer should know it's "and me," shouldn't they? (Details omitted 'cause, after all, it was a blog.)
Fun with statistics 1: Mythical average liblog - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook