Sign in or Join FriendFeed
FriendFeed is the easiest way to share online. Learn more »
Audacious network building: Just got a request from someone I've never heard of to add them to my network/vice versa on LinkedIn. On opening the note, saw that it had actually been sent to a library list with several thousand subscribers. Now *that's* network-building on a grand scale! "Sure, I'm connected with Whozis: We're both on the same list."
So did you add them? I'm trying to keep LinkedIn for those I really know well enough to recommend, not just as One Huge Network. - Lazygal
Not a chance. I'm pretty open on LinkedIn, but not for someone I've literally never heard of who's requesting 4,000 links at once. (I've found LinkedIn useless for me, but that's my fault...) - Walt Crawford
Agreed, Walt. I think a lot of these Linked-in, Facebook "invitations" come from those "invite everyone in your address book" buttons- horrible. - Maxine
Email this morning from "Elsevier" inviting me to become a reviewer, with a $100 submission fee, after which they pay $30 per page reviewed. I smell a forgery, for several reasons (not the least of which is a blatant misspelling in a banner on the letter)--I doubt that Reed Elsevier had anything to do with this email. Deleted, can't link.
bluh. what is it with publishing scams of late? - D0r0th34
$30 a page is a bit of a giveaway its a scam as well... :-) - Cameron Neylon
Well, yes, that was the second of four big warning signs. (The $100 charge being in red type--and there *being* a $100 charge to be a possible referee--was also quite a bit of a red flag.) - Walt Crawford
There is an "old" scam purporting to be from Elsevier- amazing that it is still continuing. The scam has been covered in the science news..... - Maxine
[Unlike button] here. - joe is not going rogue...
Here's a novel comment: That Reed Elsevier is the world's largest vanity publisher. See comment 75 on this post: http://whatever.scalzi.com/2009...
hee! nice - D0r0th34
Vanity presses, self publishing and PoD - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Grumpy notes on a groovy? movie - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Cites & Insights 9 now available as trade paperback - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Early announcement: Book version of C&I 9 available - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
A Sunday reminder of why I'll never be technohip: It would never occur to me to find a book in a library's stacks, take it down, scan the barcode on a smartphone and use Google Books to search inside the book...as opposed to, say, opening the book's index. [OK, I'm convinced by the commenters: It does make sense at times.]
I don't know if there are that many people around that are at that level...I can't say I would have ever though of it either - Sir Shuping
Picked it up from a Blyberg post. To me, it seems like a complex way to do a simple analog task digitally, but that's me. - Walt Crawford
depends on the quality of the index... I can think of some books where I'd prefer the word-search. having the choice doesn't seem like a bad thing. - D0r0th34
I love that some of the old texts that I'm using in my dissertation are in Google Books b/c the index in those texts rarely lists what I'm looking for. Since I now know the jargon used in the articles I want, I can search for them much easier via the search instead of skimming each page of the book. Having said that, I'd still look at the index in the physical book first for most things. - Katy S
Smartphones have barcode scanners? - Julian
iphone app store has quite a few, yes. I can't test any of them because my Touch has no camera. - D0r0th34
Um, yeah, actually, that would be an awesome way to search for word patterns in literature. . . novels and poetry and such generally doesn't come with an index. But I'd probably start by poking around in the catalog and Google Books from my home, rather than going through that set of steps. But, hey, some people like to take notes on index cards, which seems like madness to me. - laura x
Laura x - me too, but sadly the things I'm looking for aren't included in the index because at the time the index was created, it wasn't considered important (hmmmm....perhaps a lesson regarding my dissertation research). Having the full-text search is such a time saver. I seriously skimmed through every page of Library Journal, Public Libraries, and several state library associations' journals for the years 1910-1925. It was quite a slog. - Katy S
Also, many books don't have an index, especially older ones. And then there's fiction, poetry, plays, etc. with no indexes either. Of course, those older books won't have a barcode either. But then maybe your library will have barcoded the books and you're clever enough to have found a way to link your catalog records to Google Book Search. - Stephen Francoeur
Interesting thread. I guess there are cases when you really want to full-text search *one book that you're actually holding in your hand*. (By "you" I mean "not me," since I don't even carry a dumb phone most of the time, much less a Droid-level one.) - Walt Crawford
Well, technically, if I'm in the library already I probably have my laptop. With the assumption that I can connect to a wireless network, I'd access google books using my laptop. I prefer a bigger screen. - Katy S
Oh yeah. I picked a recent art history book at random which would be a perfect example for this. It had no index, so a Google Books search made it obvious in seconds that it was actually useful for the student project I had in mind. - Steve is older than ever
OK, I give. (Not enough to go buy a smartphone, but that's me.) - Walt Crawford
It's a nice bit of bricolage. Now, I want to see somebody mash up ONIX, GBooks, and the OPAC to produce an Amazonesque "search inside this book" suitable for an OPAC item display. (For extra credit, FRBRize the whole thing, so that one can search the text of a book for which GBooks has *any* edition.) - D0r0th34
Yes, I did my searching with a dumb computer. - Steve is older than ever
In the end, that post is saying Google Books Index is better than the book's own index. - Jeff Scott
I would think that would be hard to say definitively, since it would depend greatly on the book in question and its index and, even more, on what exactly the searcher was searching for. - laura x
And, of course, whether Google Books included the book--and whether the scan was good enough. - Walt Crawford
Of course, with Google Books, you get the bonus content of finger spam in your index: http://linkbun.ch/gsji - Stephen Francoeur
I always show Google Books in IL classes -- it really opens up our print collection to students, especially those researching more obscure topics. - John Dupuis
@D we have a search inside the book link from many of our opac records - works with amazon, gbooks, hathi... lemme look for a decent link - oh, but it doesn't work for LICENSED books (of course) - Christina Pikas
hah! cool. mashups by smarter people than I am FTW. - D0r0th34
come to think of it - but it would be really slow - 2 of our big engineering ebook collections are metasearchable, there's no reason we couldn't do a search inside the book... well, would be too slow, i'm thinking. - Christina Pikas
Future catalogs and an update on blogging at LLN - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
And sometimes it isn’t… - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Too darn long: An apology of sorts - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Management, open access and changes at LLN - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
How do you define “big”? - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Cites & Insights volume 9 indexes available - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Cites & Insights 9:13 (December 2009) now available - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
I'd never seen that Miedema blog post. About to bookmark it; it is teh awesome. - D0r0th34
I'd entirely forgotten it, frankly--the virtues of printing & saving leadsheets. - Walt Crawford
also, is this the place where I say that I'm pretty meh about Google Wave, and if I were to make a bet, I'd bet on it going the way of Orkut? - D0r0th34
As good a place as any. So far, I haven't even marked any Google Wave stuff in Delicious for possible discussion in C&I (but that may be me). - Walt Crawford
also re: Bivens-Tatum (have you got a link to that? I can't remember what the heck I said) -- if we can't fulfill our mission because the purchasing game is totally rigged against us, are we really failures? or are we only failures if we fail to try to change the game? (y'all know my completely biased answer, of course ;) ) - D0r0th34
and homg how did I not know about Collections 2.0? Subscribed! - D0r0th34
Apropos nothing in particular (other than made-up facts): Some blocks are easier than others. Sometimes, one statement is all it takes...fortunately, not from a library person.
Funding and Marketing at the Library Leadership Network - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Halloween pizza: Pretty scary - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Friday lesson from too many directions: Sometimes you just need to step away from the read/write web. Maybe for an hour or two. Maybe for a day. Maybe for a weekend. Maybe forever. Otherwise, you'll forget to click Cancel after writing what you'd really like to say, and... And with that, it's time to go read. A book. In paper form.
Always a good plan. - laura x
Man, if everybody did that I'd actually have to get some work done. - Steve is older than ever
Sometimes it’s just a waste - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Alright! A LITA-L post with 13, count 'em, 13 "Re:"s (one of them a RE:) before the actual subject, "Google Wave Invite." Probably not a record... four more, and Gmail will hide the actual subject entirely!
Ah, and one of the people has already made a comment about Aretha Franklin... - Walt Crawford
A tiny little LITA-related post - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Sony’s Ereader should be the Cell - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Know-how, generations, ebook readers and more at LLN - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
Library Access to Scholarship: More thoughts - http://walt.lishost.org/2009...
A public thanks to Iris J., awesome as usual, for pointing out the easy way to identify threads in FF that began in private feeds--I never noticed the little lock. (And, fortunately, the lock survives the Stylish styles I use to clean up FF.) Makes it easier to respect privacy without completely ruling out use of some FF items.
Other ways to read this feed:Feed readerFacebook